Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor, 22414-3-II
| Decision Date | 30 April 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 22414-3-II,22414-3-II |
| Court | Washington Court of Appeals |
| Parties | ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. Martin E. RAYNOR, individually, as the personal representative of the Estate of Cheryl Raynor, and as the guardian ad litem of Kathryn Raynor, a minor; David Johnson, individually and as the personal representative of the Estate of Candy Johnson, Appellants, and Margie E. King, individually; John Doe, as the personal representative of the Estate of Milton R. King; City of Longview, a Municipal Corporation; County of Cowlitz, a political subdivision of Washington State; Casey Tilton and Jane Doe Tilton, husband and wife, and their marital community; and Tom Homad and Jane Doe Homad, husband and wife, and their marital community, Defendants. |
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
This matter having come before this court on the Appellants' request for reconsideration of the published opinion, filed January 8, 1999, it is hereby
ORDERED that the opinion, reported at 93 Wash.App. 484, 969 P.2d 510, is amended as follows:
1. On page 14, the section titled and footnote 12 are eliminated;
2. On page 15, section is renumbered to ; and
3. On page 16, after the last word of section footnote symbol "12" is inserted, which reads as follows:
We need not address Raynor's argument that Margie's actions were the efficient proximate of the deaths of Candy and Cheryl because the joint obligations clause would preclude Allstate's liability even if a jury were to find Margie's actions to have been a proximate cause of the deaths.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor
...judgment as to Milton's and Margie's acts, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor, 93 Wash.App. 484, 969 P.2d 510, 975 P.2d 517, 980 P.2d 765 ANALYSIS Summary judgments are reviewed de novo, with all facts and reasonable inferences therefrom viewed in the light most ......
-
Howe v. Douglas County, 18415-3-III.
...re Marriage of Burke, 96 Wash. App. 474, 478, 980 P.2d 265 (1999); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor, 93 Wash.App. 484, 499-500, 969 P.2d 510, 975 P.2d 517, 980 P.2d 765, review granted, 139 Wash.2d 1001, 989 P.2d 1136 (1999). The Legislature has not been reluctant to declare public policy in a w......
-
Grange Insurance Association v. Evans, No. 29541-5-II (Wash. App. 1/21/2004)
.... . . against the insurer." Stouffer, 96 Wn. App. at 747 (quoting Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor, 93 Wn. App. 484, 492, 969 P.2d 510, 975 P.2d 517 (1999)). II. Policy Coverage and The `Liability Coverages' section of Evans' homeowner's insurance policy provides: COVERAGE E — Personal Liability......
-
Stouffer & Knight v. Continental Cas. Co.
...in insurance policies are strictly construed against the insurer." Allstate Ins. Co. v. Raynor, 93 Wash.App. 484, 492, 969 P.2d 510, 975 P.2d 517 (1999). II. COVERAGE UNDER LANGUAGE OF THE A. DISHONEST EMPLOYEE EXCLUSION An insurance company, as a private contracting entity, is generally pe......