Alpord v. Blackwell
Decision Date | 17 November 1903 |
Citation | 45 S.E. 785,119 Ga. 64 |
Parties | McLANAHAN & ALPORD. v. BLACKWELL. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
EVIDENCE—CER?IFIED PAPERS—BANKRUPTCY —COPY—LOST INSTRUMENT—ACTION BY TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY.
1. The proper officer to certify to the genuineness of a court paper is the legal custodian of such paper. 1 Gr. Ev. (15th Ed.) § 485. In a proceeding in bankruptcy, the custody of all papers after reference is in the referee, and under section 21d of the national bankruptcy act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 552 [if. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3430], as amended by Act Cong, approved Feb. 5, 1903 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1903, p. 409; Frank's Ann. Bankr. Law, p. 77), such papers may be certified either by the referee or clerk. It was accordingly not error to admit in evidence, in the trial of a suit brought by a trustee in bankruptcy to set aside as fraudulent a sale made by the bankrupt, certified copies of papers in the bankruptcy proceedings, over the objection that they were certified by the referee and not by the clerk of the bankrupt court.
2. An established copy of a lost original paper has all the force of the original. Civ. Code 1895, § 3611. Consequently a copy of a court paper, certified by the proper officer to be a
true, full, and complete copy of original copy as established, now on file in my office, " is admissible in evidence to the same extent as would be a certified copy of the original paper.
3. The right of a trustee in bankruptcy to bring suit in behalf of the bankrupt estate is incident to the office, and no written authority to bring suit need be shown bv him. Chism v. Citizens' Bank, 27 South. 637, 77 Miss. 599; Traders' Ins. Co. v. Mann, 118 Ga. —, 45 S. E. 42(1.
4. There was no material error in admitting any of the evidence objected to, or in giving any of the charge to which exception was taken. The evidence warranted the verdict, which has the approval of the court below, and this court will not interfere with the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error from Superior Court, Elbert County; H. M. Holden, Judge.
Action by J. H. Blackwell, trustee in bankruptcy, against McLanahan & Alford. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.
C. P. Harris, for plaintiffs in error.
Z. B. Rogers, for defendant in error.
CANDLER, J. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Enterprise Distributing Corporation v. Zalkin
... ... 274, 67 S.E. 716. The ... trustee could sue without specific authority from the court ... of his appointment. McLanahan v. Blackwell, 119 Ga ... 64, 45 S.E. 785; Chalman v. Dodd, 23 Ga.App. 653, 99 ... S.E. 150. The court below did not err in overruling the ... demurrer to ... ...
-
Southern Ry. Co v. Cole
...from any court an order or written authority so to do. Traders' Insurance Co. v. Mann, 118 Ga. 381 (5), 45 S. E. 426; McLanahan v. Blackwell, 119 Ga. 64, 45 S. E. 785; Chalman v. Dodd, 23 Ga. App. 653, 99 S. E. 150. 2. The title to property of a bankrupt's estate vests in the trustee as of ......
-
Whitaker v. State
... ... was not admissible; and, if the evidence was material, a ... certified copy should have been offered. McLanahan v ... Blackwell", 119 Ga. 64, 45 S.E. 785 ... \xC2" ... ...
-
Huckabee v. State
... ... official of the United States government, and his failure to ... do so would subject him to punishment. Compare McLanahan ... v. Blackwell, 119 Ga. 64, 45 S.E. 785 ... The ... ...