Alsager v. District Court of Polk County, Iowa
| Decision Date | 08 December 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1173,76-1173 |
| Citation | 545 F.2d 1137 |
| Parties | Charles LeRoy ALSAGER, Sr. et al., Appellees, v. DISTRICT COURT OF POLK COUNTY, IOWA, et al., Appellants. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Raymond W. Sullins and Harold A. Young, Asst. Attys. Gen., Des Moines, Iowa, for appellants; Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., on brief.
Rena K. Uviller, American Civil Liberties Union, New York City, for appellees; Burt Neuborne and Melvin L. Wulf, New York City, Gordon E. Allen, ICLU, Des Moines, Iowa, on brief.
Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge, and HENLEY, Circuit Judge.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis that plaintiffs were denied substantive due process, in that the State of Iowa failed to exhibit the threshold harm necessary to give the state a compelling interest sufficient to justify permanent termination of the parent-child relationships, and on the further basis that plaintiffs were denied procedural due process, in that they were not given adequate notice of what conduct allegedly warranted such termination, both in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 1 On these two issues, we approve and adopt the opinion of the district court, the Honorable William C. Hanson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, reported at 406 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.Iowa 1975).
Other issues reached by the district court, viz., the vagueness and overbreadth attacks upon the facial validity of Code of Iowa § 232.41(2)(b) and (d), 406 F.Supp. at 17-21 and 24, and the appropriate standard of proof at a parental termination hearing, 406 F.Supp. at 25, need not now be resolved in order to effect a plenary disposition of the present controversy between the parties and we do not reach such issues. See Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 162, 82 S.Ct. 248, 7 L.Ed.2d 207 (1961).
Although we decline to resolve whether the statutory provisions cited above are facially unconstitutional, as alternatively held by the district court, we cannot refrain from noting, at minimum, that both the vagueness and overbreadth attacks upon these provisions are serious ones. By declining to affirm on these grounds, however, we afford the Iowa courts an additional opportunity to give the statutory provisions a plainly desirable limiting construction. See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 111-12, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972) (vagueness), and Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 613, 93 S.Ct. 2908, 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973) (overbreadth). Given the obvious comity concerns at issue, we view such disposition as the one most appropriate.
Since we expressly reserve a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bowers v. State
...(right to bear arms); Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., Iowa, 406 F.Supp. 10, 18-19 (S.D.Iowa 1975), Aff'd per curiam, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir. 1976) (statute terminating parental rights for refusal to "(give child) necessary parental care and protection" or for "conduct . . . detrimen......
-
In re Scott County Master Docket
...welfare of its citizens of tender age." Alsager v. District Court of Polk County, Iowa, 406 F.Supp. 10, 22 (S.D.Ia.1975), aff'd, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir.1976). The state has an "urgent interest" in the welfare of the child. Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27, 101 S.Ct. at 2159. Indeed, as the Supreme ......
-
Santosky v. Kramer
...2371, 60 L.Ed.2d 994 (1979); Alsager v. District Court of Polk County, 406 F.Supp. 10, 25 (S.D.Iowa 1975), aff'd on other grounds, 545 F.2d 1137 (CA8 1976). 4. Respondent had made an earlier and unsuccessful termination effort in September 1976. After a factfinding hearing, the Family Court......
-
Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services Agency
...of Foster Families, supra, 431 U.S. at 844, (97 S.Ct. at 2110). 566 F.2d at 825 (footnote omitted). 13 In Alsager v. District Court, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir. 1976), aff'g per curiam 406 F.Supp. 10 (S.D.Iowa 1975), the court considered, in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a case factually ve......
-
The best interests standards: a comparison of the state's parens patriae authority and judicial oversight in best interests determinations for children and incompetent patients.
...grounds sub nom., Moore v. Sims, 442 U.S. 415 (1979); Alsager v. District Court, 406 F. Supp. 10 (S.D. Iowa 1975), aff'd per curiam, 545 F.2d 1137 (8th Cir. 1976). The U.S. Supreme Court has referred to this right as a "fundamental liberty interest." Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1......