Alsberg, In re
| Decision Date | 11 October 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. NC-92-2318-JA,No. 94-15085,94-15085,NC-92-2318-JA |
| Citation | 68 F.3d 312 |
| Parties | Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,676, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7988, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,733 In re Terry ALSBERG, dba Alsberg Brothers Boatworks, Debtor. Terry ALSBERG, dba Alsberg Brothers Boatworks, Appellant, v. Jerome E. ROBERTSON, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee. BAPsO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Henry G. Rendler, San Jose, CA, for appellant.
Charles P. Maher, Rosenblum, Parish & Isaacs, San Francisco, CA, for appellee.
Appeal from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit.
Before: BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and JUSTIN L. QUACKENBUSH, District Judge. *
Debtor Terry Alsberg, dba Alsberg Brothers Boatworks, ("Alsberg") appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("the BAP") decision that Alsberg is entitled only to the $45,000 homestead exemption allowed under California law from proceeds from the sale of his residence. Alsberg argued to the BAP that he was additionally entitled to the value of post-bankruptcy-petition appreciation in the value of his residence. The BAP held that such appreciation accrued to the bankruptcy estate.
The BAP had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158(b), and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Secs. 158(c) and (d). We affirm.
Alsberg filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on May 29, 1987. At that time he owned and occupied a residence in Santa Cruz, California ("the residence"). As determined by the bankruptcy court and the BAP, the residence was worth $259,000 at the time of filing. At the time of filing, the residence was encumbered by a promissory note secured by a deed of trust for $225,125 ("the mortgage") and tax liens totalling approximately $86,000. 1 Under the versions of 11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(b)(2)(A) and California Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 704.730(a)(2) in effect at the time of filing, Alsberg was entitled to claim a homestead exemption of $45,000 on the residence.
On February 4, 1988, Alsberg filed amended Schedules A and B. The amended schedules of February 4, 1988 do not include a schedule B-4, the schedule for claiming exemptions.
In August 1988, Alsberg entered into an agreement to sell the residence for $380,000 and moved for court approval of the sale. On September 28, 1988, the bankruptcy court heard Alsberg's motion concurrently with a motion to convert the case to a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. The court converted the case to Chapter 7 and ordered the motion for approval of sale held in abeyance pending review by the trustee, Jerome Robertson ("Robertson"). Robertson determined that the sale should go forward, but that Alsberg's motion was defective. Accordingly, Robertson moved for approval of the sale. The motion was granted on October 28, 1988 and escrow closed on November 1, 1988. The proceeds of the sale amounted to approximately $115,000, after payment of the mortgage, applicable costs of sale and capital gains tax.
On January 24, 1989, Alsberg filed an Amended B-4 schedule, along with other amended and supplemental schedules. In the January 24, 1989, B-4 Schedule, for the first time, Alsberg claimed a homestead exemption of $45,000. Only the proceeds of the sale of the residence existed at this time.
In October 1991, Alsberg moved to compel Robertson to abandon the proceeds of the sale, arguing that because the amount owed on the mortgage ($225,125), plus the homestead exemption ($45,000), exceeded the value of the residence at the time of filing ($259,000), the residence was effectively removed from the bankruptcy estate at the time of filing. Accordingly, Alsberg concluded that the estate was not entitled to any of the proceeds of the sale, and instead, he should receive them. The bankruptcy court determined that (1) Alsberg was entitled to a homestead exemption of $45,000; (2) the property was worth $259,000 at the time of filing; (3) the tax liens were irrelevant to a determination of the amount allowable as a homestead exemption; and (4) because the estate had an interest in the residence when Alsberg filed bankruptcy, and maintained that interest through the time of sale, the estate was entitled to any appreciation in the value of the residence between the time of filing and the time of sale.
Both Alsberg and Robertson appealed to the BAP. The BAP affirmed, holding that the estate was entitled to all post-bankruptcy-petition appreciation in the property, but that Alsberg was entitled to $45,000 of the sale proceeds as his homestead exemption.
Alsberg timely appeals.
We review de novo decisions of the BAP. Steelcase Inc. v. Johnston (In re Johnston), 21 F.3d 323, 326 (9th Cir.1994). We review, as does the BAP, the bankruptcy court's conclusions of law de novo and its findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard. Id.
Under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 522(b)(2)(A), a debtor may claim a homestead exemption for his residence, and the amount of the exemption may be determined by state law. California Code of Civil Procedure Sec. 704.730(a)(2) sets the amount at $45,000 for debtor-homeowners in Alsberg's circumstances.
Alsberg argues that an aggregate $33,875 interest in the residence became the property of the bankruptcy estate on the date of filing the bankruptcy petition. This sum represents $259,000 market value at the time the petition was filed, less a note for $225,125 secured by a deed of trust. He contends that the $45,000 homestead exemption was effective, apparently automatically, immediately after filing. Alsberg also contends that the homestead exemption operated to move the $33,875 interest out of the bankruptcy estate, leaving the estate with no interest in the residence after the date of filing the bankruptcy petition. Alsberg concludes that because the estate had no interest in the residence after the date of filing the bankruptcy petition, the estate is not entitled to post-bankruptcy-petition appreciation.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wilson v. Rigby
...to claim an exemption with a fixed dollar value, based on demographic criteria—not home equity. See, e.g. , Alsberg v. Robertson (In re Alsberg ), 68 F.3d 312, 314 (9th Cir. 1995) ; Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 704.730 .2 By contrast, Washington applies a sliding scale in which "the homestead ex......
-
In re Erickson
...541(a)(6) as well to justify the estate's inclusion of post-petition appreciation as its property. Notwithstanding that Reed, Hyman and Alsberg were decided by the Ninth Circuit in the context of California homestead exemption law, as we noted in Vu, the estate's entitlement to postpetition......
-
Milkovich v. United States
...the entire outstanding principal amount of the mortgage, including ... the interest thereon."); cf. also Alsberg v. Robertson (In re Alsberg ), 68 F.3d 312, 313–14 (9th Cir. 1995) (noting that the value of debtors' home rose from $259,000 to $380,000 one year after they filed for bankruptcy......
-
In re Greer
...within a debtor's bankruptcy estate, and may be therefore utilized by the bankruptcy trustee. See, e.g., Alsberg v. Robertson (In re Alsberg), 68 F.3d 312 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1168, 116 S.Ct. 1568, 134 L.Ed.2d 667 (1996) (postpetition appreciation in home value is property......
-
Postpetition Proceeds of Exempt Interests in Property: Who Owns the Appreciation?
...Wilson v. Rigby, 909 F.3d 306, 311 (9th Cir. 2018); In re Orton, 687 F.3d 612, 619 (3d Cir. 2012); Alsberg v. Robertson (In re Alsberg), 68 F.3d 312, 315 (9th Cir. 1995); Schwaber v. Reed (In re Reed), 940 F.2d 1317, 1323 (9th Cir. 1991); Klein v. Chappell (In re Chappell), 373 B.R. 73, 79 ......
-
The Housing Bubble and Consumer Bankruptcy (Parts I and II).
...the assets more efficiently.). (72) Id. (73) Robertson v. Alsberg (In re Alsberg), 161 B.R. 680, 683 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1993), aff'd, 68 F.3d 312 (9th Cir. (74) See Mary Josephine Newborn, Undersecured Creditors in Bankruptcy: Dewsnup, Nobelman, and the Decline of Priority. 25 ARIZ. ST. L. RE......
-
Chapter I. Effectuating the Fresh Start
...308-09 (9th Cir. 2018); Gebhart v. Gaughan (In re Gebhart), 621 F.3d 1206, 1211-12 (9th Cir. 2010); Alsberg v. Robertson (In re Alsberg), 68 F.3d 312, 314-15 (9th Cir. 1995); Hyman v. Plotkin (In re Hyman), 967 F.2d 1316, 1321 (9th Cir. 1992); Schwaber v. Reed (In re Reed), 940 F.2d 1317, 1......