Alvini v. Colonial School Dist., 13

• Decision Date: 17 May 1994
• Docket Number: No. 13,1994,13
• Citation: 645 A.2d 568
• Parties: 93 Ed. Law Rep. 1283 Elaine ALVINI, Peggy A. Beers, Blair Benson, Eleanor S. Bentz, Susan Cannon, Delores W. Chappell, Beverly Clark, Hilda A. Craig, Gloria J. Diggs, June E. Dixon, Emma L. Fowler, Elizabeth Grier, Lorraine E. Hand, Joyce Hatfield, Rose M. Henderson, Connie Hicks, Margaret A. Hinson, Joanne M. Hopkins, Shirley A. Hurd, Roberta Krieg, Carol A. Lopez, Mary Rae Mahoney, Laura H. Mathis, Elvinia Moody, Mary M. Pollard, Janet M. Reed, Cathy L. Reese, Marjorie Rodriguez, Irene Schorah, Gladys Skrzec, Lubomira Szeremeta, Patricia A. Till, Doris Wilmer, Rosalie Wilson and Catherine J. Zimmerman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Colonial Paraprofessional Association and Colonial Food Service Workers Association, Defendants Below, Appellees. Public Employment Relations Board, Defendant Agency Below, Appellee. . Submitted:
• Court: Supreme Court of Delaware

Page 568

645 A.2d 568

93 Ed. Law Rep. 1283

Elaine ALVINI, Peggy A. Beers, Blair Benson, Eleanor S. Bentz, Susan Cannon, Delores W. Chappell, Beverly Clark, Hilda A. Craig, Gloria J. Diggs, June E. Dixon, Emma L. Fowler, Elizabeth Grier, Lorraine E. Hand, Joyce Hatfield, Rose M. Henderson, Connie Hicks, Margaret A. Hinson, Joanne M. Hopkins, Shirley A. Hurd, Roberta Krieg, Carol A. Lopez, Mary Rae Mahoney, Laura H. Mathis, Elvinia Moody, Mary M. Pollard, Janet M. Reed, Cathy L. Reese, Marjorie Rodriguez, Irene Schorah, Gladys Skrzec, Lubomira Szeremeta, Patricia A. Till, Doris Wilmer, Rosalie Wilson and Catherine J. Zimmerman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. COLONIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Colonial Paraprofessional Association and Colonial Food Service Workers Association, Defendants Below, Appellees. Public Employment Relations Board, Defendant Agency Below, Appellee.

No. 13, 1994.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: May 17, 1994.

Decided: May 18, 1994.

AFFIRMED.

Before VEASEY, C.J., and HOLLAND and HARTNETT, JJ.

ORDER

HOLLAND, Justice.

This 18th day of May, 1994, the Court having considered this matter on the briefs filed by the parties, and having concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Court of Chancery in its well-reasoned opinion dated December 7, 1993.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.