Alwardt v. Alwardt
| Decision Date | 18 January 1973 |
| Citation | 340 N.Y.S.2d 209,41 A.D.2d 592 |
| Parties | Lorraine ALWARDT, Respondent-Appellant, v. Ralph ALWARDT, Appellant-Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David C. Leven, Rochester, Marianne Artusio, Pelham, for appellant-respondent.
Gerald Manioci, Rochester, for respondent-appellant.
Before DEL VECCHIO, J.P., and MARSH, WITMER, CARDAMONE and HENRY, JJ.
Defendant-husband appeals from that portion of the judgment which awarded $550 counsel fees to his plaintiff-wife's attorney in a default divorce action. The defendant-husband contends that he was indigent and, therefore, qualified to receive and did obtain free legal assistance from the Monroe County Bar Legal Assistance Corporation which represented his interests in the divorce action brought against him by his wife. On August 5, at a time when defendant was gainfully employed, plaintiff consulted her present attorney. The record reveals that defendant-husband has a net take-home pay of $131.20 per week. He is presently obligated under a Family Court order to provide support and maintenance for his wife and four children in the amount of $75 per week and also to pay $131 monthly on the mortgage on the marital home. After making these payments defendant-husband is left with approximately $114 per month from which he is also required under the Family Court order to pay the heat, utilities, phone, water and repairs (assuming that real estate taxes and insurance are included in the monthly mortgage payments) on the marital residence. This order entered August 24, 1971 also granted custody of the children and exclusive possession of the marital home to the wife. These matters were not contested in the default divorce action. The summons in the plaintiff-wife's matrimonial action was served on August 31, 1971. In September, 1971 the husband lost his job. The wife's attorney was served with a Notice of Appearance on September 8, 1971 from the monroe County Bar Legal Assistance Corporation. At that time both plaintiff-wife and her attorney testified that they knew defendant was unemployed. Thereafter, some of the legal services for which the trial court awarded counsel fees in the amount of $550 were performed. At the trial plaintiff testified that she had no funds to pay her attorney. The defendant did not testify. Under these circumstances, we consider an award for counsel fees an improvident exercise of discretion. The trial court should take more proof on the issue of the husband's indigency. The court, of course, may direct the husband to pay such counsel fees to enable the wife to carry on her divorce action '. . . as, in the court's discretion,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thaler v. Thaler
...matrimonial actions to insure that both parties have legal representation, and particularly an indigent (spouse).' Alwardt v. Alwardt, 41 A.D.2d 592, 340 N.Y.S.2d 209 (1973). In some sense, counsel fees are just a specialized form of support. See, e.g. Shenker v. Shenker, 14 Misc.2d 980, 17......
-
Proceeding for Support Under Article 4 of Family Court Act, Matter of
...means and substantial debts. The Court must of course in a fee award take into account respondent's means. See, e.g., Alwardt v. Alwardt, 41 A.D.2d 592, 340 N.Y.S.2d 209; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 55 Misc.2d 691, 286 N.Y.S.2d 346, aff'd. 29 A.D.2d 739, 287 N.Y.S.2d In the Court's discretion, a ......
-
Bazant v. Bazant
...76 A.D.2d 905, 429 N.Y.S.2d 42 cf. Kolmin v. Kolmin, 65 A.D.2d 928, 929, 410 N.Y.S.2d 447 (4th Dept. 1978]; Alwardt v. Alwardt, 41 A.D.2d 592, 340 N.Y.S.2d 209 [4th Dept. 1973]). ...
-
Rados v. Rados
...thereof is merely one factor to be considered in the totality of the financial circumstances (Kolmin v. Kolmin, supra; Alwardt v. Alwardt, 41 A.D.2d 592, 340 N.Y.S.2d 209; see also, Walsh v. Walsh, 92 A.D.2d 345, 346, 462 N.Y.S.2d Moreover, the award of counsel fees was justified in view of......