Alyssa Originals, Inc. v. Finkelstein
| Decision Date | 26 October 1964 |
| Citation | 22 A.D.2d 701,254 N.Y.S.2d 21 |
| Parties | ALYSSA ORIGINALS, INC., Respondent, v. Isidore FINKELSTEIN et al., Appellants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Nathan Dechter, New York City, for appellants.
Max J. Gwertzman, New York City, for respondent.
Before BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, CHRIST, HILL and RABIN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In an action by a tenant against the landlords to recover damages for injury to property, based upon the alleged breach of covenants contained in a lease, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 17, 1964, which denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (in the action denominated No. 1) on the ground that its two alleged causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Order reversed, without costs; defendants' cross motion granted, and complaint in action No. 1 dismissed, without costs.
The essence of plaintiff's action and the basis for its recovery, as judged by its own pleadings, is defendants' negligence, in that rain damage was caused to its personal property by the failure of defendants to exercise due care in maintaining and repairing the roof and skylights of the leased premises. This is so notwithstanding the assertion that in reality the action is ex contractu, i. e., for recovery of damages due to the breach of the covenants in the lease for proper and safe maintenance and quiet enjoyment. On this issue it is particularly pertinent that, in paragraph '12th' of the lease, the parties themselves agreed that: 'The Landlord is exempt from any and all liability for any damage or injury to * * * property caused by or resulting from * * * rain * * * or any leak or flow from or into any part of said building * * * unless said damage or injury be caused by or be due to the negligence of the Landlord.'
In effect, plaintiff conceded that three years had elapsed from the time of its loss until it commenced its action. Its position, however, is that the six-year Statute of Limitations (CPLR § 213, subd. 2), relating to actions 'upon a contractual obligation or liability express or implied,' is applicable. With this contention we disagree. The test for determining which Statute of Limitations is applicable in a given situation is: what is the 'essence of the action,' not 'its mere name' (King v. King, 13 A.D.2d 437, 218 N.Y.S.2d 230; Atlas Assur....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Paver and Wildfoerster v. Catholic High School Ass'n
...v. Gale, 29 A.D.2d 766, 767, 287 N.Y.S.2d 710, 711, affd. 23 N.Y.2d 756, 296 N.Y.S.2d 953, 244 N.E.2d 468; Alyssa Originals v. Finkelstein, 22 A.D.2d 701, 254 N.Y.S.2d 21, affd. 24 N.Y.2d 976, 302 N.Y.S.2d 599, 250 N.E.2d 82; Carr v. Lipshie, 8 A.D.2d 330, 332, 187 N.Y.S.2d 564, 566, affd. ......
-
Baratta v. Kozlowski
...529, affd. 287 N.Y. 670, 39 N.E.2d 290), but sometimes applied to pecuniary interest cases as well (compare Alyssa Originals v. Finkelstein, 22 A.D.2d 701, 254 N.Y.S.2d 21, affd. 24 N.Y.2d 976, 302 N.Y.S.2d 599, 250 N.E.2d 82; Carr v. Lipshie, 8 A.D.2d 330, 187 N.Y.S.2d 564, affd. 9 N.Y.2d ......
-
Steiner v. Wenning
...was the failure to use due care. Thus, there was negligence or malpractice, and not breach of contract. In Alyssa Originals v. Finkelstein, 22 A.D.2d 701, 254 N.Y.S.2d 21, affd. 24 N.Y.2d 976, 302 N.Y.S.2d 599, 250 N.E.2d 82, we held that a tenant seeking redress from his landlord for damag......
-
Union Bank of Switzerland v. HS Equities, Inc.
...421, 423 (1953); Webber v. Herkimer & Mohawk St. R.R., 109 N.Y. 311, 314-15, 16 N.E. 358, 359-60 (1888); Alyssa Originals, Inc. v. Finkelstein, 22 A.D.2d 701, 254 N.Y.S.2d 21 (1964), aff'd, 24 N.Y.2d 976, 302 N.Y.S.2d 599, 250 N.E.2d 82 (1969); Atlas Assur. Co. v. Barry Tire & Service Co., ......