Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co.
Decision Date | 13 January 1966 |
Citation | 214 N.E.2d 379,267 N.Y.S.2d 218,17 N.Y.2d 500 |
Parties | , 214 N.E.2d 379 Norman AMELKIN, Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL TRADING COMPANY, Inc., et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 23 A.D.2d 830, 259 N.Y.S.2d 396.
An action in libel was filed.
The Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County, Arthur G. Klein, J., denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state cause of action, and defendants appealed.
The Appellate Division held that a letter stating that insurance company's agent knew of defendant finance company's interest but neglected or refused to properly represent such company's interest in an insurance policy was not actionable on its face and so was not actionable without the pleading of special damages. The order was reversed on the law, and motion to dismiss was granted. The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals.
Fine, Posner & Tofel, New York City (Burton M. Fine and Robert L. Tofel, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Townley, Updike, Carter & Rodgers, New York City (James W. Rodgers and Anson M. Keller, New York City, of counsel), for respondents.
Order affirmed, with costs.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Matherson v. Marchello
...Rail Corp., 74 A.D.2d 985, 426 N.Y.S.2d 182; Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co., 23 A.D.2d 830, 259 N.Y.S.2d 396, affd. 17 N.Y.2d 500, 267 N.Y.S.2d 218, 214 N.E.2d 379; 2 PJI [1983 Supp., p. 97] ). They read Hinsdale v. Orange County Pub., 17 N.Y.2d 284, 270 N.Y.S.2d 592, 217 N.E.2d 650 as e......
-
Aronson v. Wiersma
... ... Horn Constr. Co., 58 A.D.2d 574, 395 N.Y.S.2d 113; Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co., 23 A.D.2d 830, 259 N.Y.S.2d 396, affd. 17 N.Y.2d 500, 267 N.Y.S.2d 218, ... ...
-
Sadowy v. Sony Corp. of America
...(S.D.N.Y.1975); Amelkin v. Commercial Trading Co., 23 A.D.2d 830, 831, 259 N.Y.S.2d 396, 398 (1st Dep't 1965), aff'd, 17 N.Y.2d 500, 214 N.E.2d 379, 267 N.Y.S.2d 218 (1966). However, this remark smacks more of reporting a characteristic of the plaintiff, i. e., that he is professionally unr......
-
Bordoni v. New York Times Company, Inc.
...N.E.2d 633 (1969). 6 Amelkin v. Commercial Trad. Co., 23 A.D. 2d 830, 259 N.Y.S.2d 396, 398 (1st Dep't 1965), aff'd, 17 N.Y.2d 500, 267 N.Y.S.2d 218, 214 N.E.2d 379 (1966). 7 November v. Time, Inc., 13 N.Y.2d 175, 178-79, 244 N.Y.S.2d 309, 194 N.E.2d 126 (1963); O'Connell v. The Press Pub. ......