Ameller By and Through Ameller v. City of Miami, 83-1966

Decision Date03 April 1984
Docket NumberNo. 83-1966,83-1966
Citation447 So.2d 1014
PartiesMauricio AMELLER, a minor, By and Through Jorge AMELLER and Maria De Los Angeles Ameller, his parents, and Jorge Ameller and Maria De Los Angeles Ameller, individually, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI, a Municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Gaston R. Alvarez and Roberto F. Fleitas, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Lanza, Sevier, Womack & O'Connor and Hector J. Lombana, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This case presents the same question as that addressed in Alegre v. Shurkey, 396 So.2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), namely, whether a complaint alleging that the defendant placed monkey bars in its public park over a hard-packed ground surface, states a cause of action for negligence. 1 In Alegre, a majority of the court held that no cause of action was stated; here, a majority of this court, agreeing with the dissenting opinion of Judge Ervin in Alegre, 396 So.2d at 248, holds otherwise.

Accordingly, the order dismissing the appellant's complaint is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

HENDRY, J., dissents.

1 There is no contention that there were rocks under the apparatus, and we are thus unable to distinguish Alegre as we did in Atlantic Christian Schools, Inc. v. Salinas, 422 So.2d 362 (Fla.3d DCA 1982).

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Echevarria v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 1984
    ... ... Fred Lewis; Genden & Bach, Miami, for appellant ...         Barnett & ... ...
  • City of Miami v. Ameller
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 3, 1985
    ...Miami, and Jesus F. Bujan of Fleitas & Bujan, Miami, for respondents. McDONALD, Justice. We have for review Ameller v. City of Miami, 447 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), which directly and expressly conflicts with Alegre v. Shurkey, 396 So.2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). We have jurisdiction. Ar......
  • CUSICK EX REL. CUSICK v. City of Neptune Beach, 1D99-2884.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2000
    ...or a tenant's recovery. Alegre, 396 So.2d at 251. In 1984, the Third District Court of Appeal, in Ameller ex rel. Ameller v. City of Miami, 447 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), adopted the rationale of the dissent in Alegre and reversed the dismissal of a complaint which had alleged liability......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT