American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lebanon Bank & Trust Co.
Decision Date | 25 August 1945 |
Citation | 192 S.W.2d 245,28 Tenn.App. 618 |
Parties | AMERICAN BANK & TRUST CO. v. LEBANON BANK & TRUST CO. |
Court | Tennessee Court of Appeals |
Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court Jan. 19, 1946.
Appeal from Chancery Court, Wilson County; S. A. Marable Chancellor.
Suit by the American Bank & Trust Company against the Lebanon Bank & Trust Company to settle rights in regard to items of disputed accounting. Decree for defendant and complainant appeals.
Affirmed.
Louis Chambers and Allison B. Humphreys, Jr. both of Lebanon, for appellant.
Albert Williams and Bass, Berry & Sims, all of Nashville, and L. H Walker, of Lebanon, for appellee.
American Bank & Trust Company of Lebanon, Tennessee, brought this suit against Lebanon Bank & Trust Company of Lebanon, Tennessee, to surcharge and falsify a report or accounting which defendant made concerning certain assets which complainant alleged it had transferred to defendant in trust. Several items of the account were in dispute in the chancery court. Only one item is involved on the appeal, the others having been settled by decree of the chancellor.
The pleadings make this issue on the item before this Court: From cash received by liquidating the assets in question defendant was directed to pay to the party which advanced $166,974.24, the sum of $86,974.24. This claim of $86,974.24 was assigned to defendant. If the assignment is valid, complainant owed defendant a balance of $61,929.37 as of July 29, 1942, and is entitled to apply any further cash realized from these assets to the payment of this balance. If the assignment is invalid, defendant owed complainant the sum of $25,044.87 as of July 29, 1942. Complainant contends the assignment is invalid because it was made to defendant individually for the nominal consideration of $1 while defendant was trustee of the assets out of which this claim should be paid; by the acceptance of this gift defendant made a personal profit from the handling of the trust estate; and that it is precluded from making this personal profit under rules of law and equity governing such transactions.
To the contrary, defendant contends that it had a right to accept the gift under the circumstances of this case, and so the issue was made.
The chancellor decided the issue in defendant's favor, and dismissed complainant's bill at its cost. Complainant appealed.
Four questions are made by the assignments of error which we state affirmatively:
1. Defendant was allowed credit for the claim of $86,974.24 which American National Bank, the original owner, had assigned to defendant, the trustee.
2. Complainant's bill should have been sustained under the relief granted.
3. Defendant should have been required to reduce to cash all assets which it had received from complainant and to account for same.
4. The costs were decreed against complainant.
These questions will be determined in the order stated.
(1) Was defendant entitled to credit for the claim of $86,974.24 which American National Bank, the original owner, assigned to it?
The material facts are these: A financial crisis occurred in this country in 1929. For many months business firms failed. Caldwell & Company, a large investment corporation located at Nashville, Tennessee, was among them. Fourth & First National Bank of Nashville and American National Bank of Nashville were large banking institutions located in Nashville, Tennessee, at that time. The failure of Caldwell & Company weakened Fourth & First National Bank to the extent that it was deemed advisable to effect a merger between that bank and American National Bank. Substantially, the plan of merger was that American National Bank would take over all the assets of Fourth & First National Bank, and assume all its liabilities. This merger became effective November 26, 1930.
Prior to this merger Fourth & First National Bank owned or controlled a majority of the capital stock of American Bank & Trust Company of Lebanon, Tennessee; and American National Bank owned or controlled a majority of the capital stock of Lebanon Bank & Trust Company of Lebanon, Tennessee. The merger of the Nashville banks put the control of both the Lebanon banks in American National Bank.
An audit of the complainant bank, about that time, showed that it was insolvent. In order to save it from failure and liquidation through court proceedings, a plan was devised whereby a merger of complainant and defendant would be made. The contract between the banks under which the merger was effected was:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hail v. Nashville Trust Co.
... ... Bank and ... Fourth & First Banks, Inc ... Walker & Hooker ... Eng.Rep. 801; 2 Scott on Trusts, Sec. 170.7; cf. American ... Bank & Trust Co. v. Lebanon Bank & Trust Co., 28 ... Tenn.App. 618, ... ...
-
Victor v. Hillebrecht
...other party, takes the interest in the trust estate which the assignor had, in the absence of fraud. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Lebanon Bank & Trust Co. 28 Tenn.App. 618, 192 S.W.2d 245, certiorari denied. In Froneberger v. Lewis, 79 N.C. 426; Swineford v. Virginia Trust Co., 154 Va. 751,......