American Coal Co. v. Allegany County Com'rs
| Court | Maryland Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | BURKE, J. |
| Citation | American Coal Co. v. Allegany County Com'rs, 128 Md. 564, 98 A. 143 (Md. 1916) |
| Decision Date | 04 May 1916 |
| Docket Number | 8. |
| Parties | AMERICAN COAL CO. v. ALLEGANY COUNTY COM'RS. |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Allegany County; Robert R. Henderson Judge.
"To be officially reported."
Action by the County Commissioners of Allegany County against the American Coal Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Ferdinand Williams, of Cumberland, for appellant.
Walter C. Capper and George Henderson, both of Cumberland, for appellees.
This is the defendant's appeal from a judgment for $600 entered against it in the circuit court for Allegany county. The suit was brought to recover certain assessments for which it is claimed the defendant --which is a corporation engaged in the mining of coal and clay in that county--is liable under the provisions of chapter 153 of the Acts of 1910, as amended by Acts 1912, c. 445. The single question in the case relates to the constitutionality of this legislation, and this question was raised by a demurrer to the amended declaration. It will be necessary to state such portions of the acts which it is claimed are invalid, both under the state and federal Constitutions. The object of these acts was the creation of a fund, to be known as "Miners' and Operators' Co-operative Relief Fund," for the relief and sustenance of employés injured in coal and clay mining in Allegany and Garrett counties, and the dependents of employés injured or killed in such mining.
Section 2 of chapter 153 of the Acts of 1910 declared that the word "operator," as used in the statute, should include every corporation, person, partnership, or association engaged in the business of coal mining or clay mining in those counties, and that the word "employé," as used therein, should include miners, helpers, laborers drivers, trappers, roadmen, propmen, repairers, foremen superintendents, and every employé engaged directly in or about the coal and clay mine of an operator. Provision is made as follows by section 3 of the act for the creation and maintenance of the fund:
Section 4 deals with the custody and safekeeping of the fund. Section 5 deals with the disbursements from the fund. The provisions of this section are here quoted:
Section 6 confers power upon the county commissioners of the respective counties to determine certain questions arising upon the application of a personal representative of a deceased employé for relief money and provides that:
"From any order passed by said county commissioners under this section the personal representative or any person claiming to be a dependent may appeal within sixty days to the circuit court of such county, whereupon such circuit court shall have jurisdiction to determine the issues of fact and law raised by such appeal, and may pass such rules as may be judged necessary to expedite and effectuate the determination...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.
... ... to Circuit Court, Davidson County; A. B. Neil, Judge ... Action ... by ... operation of coal mines nor to the employés thereof, except, ... that any ... coal and clay in two designated counties. American Coal ... Co. v. Allegheny County, 128 Md. 564, 98 A. 143 ... ...
-
Breimhorst v. Beckman
... ... County; Joseph J. Moriarty, ... Streissguth ... See, ... State ex rel. People's Coal & Ice Co. v. District ... Court, 129 Minn. 502, 153 N.W ... 44, 63 L.Ed. 1161, affirming Sweeting v ... American Knife Co., 226 N.Y. 199, 123 N.E. 82; Note, 12 ... Mont. 522, 179 P. 499; American Coal Co. v. Allegany County ... Com'rs, 128 Md. 564, 98 A. 143; State ex rel ... ...
-
Dasch v. Jackson
... ... of express powers for "such county or counties" as ... should form a charter under its ... American constitutional law that ... every man has the right to ... 6, ... 64 L.R.A. 637, 1 Ann.Cas. 742; American Coal Co. v ... County Commissioners of Allegany County, 128 ... ...
-
State v. Shapiro
... ... 377, 14 S.Ct. 570, 38 L.Ed. 485; Amer. Coal Co. v ... Allegany Co., 128 Md. 564, 98 A. 143; Mt ... population of the county or city where the business is being ... conducted. In ... ...