American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Roddy
Decision Date | 09 June 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 1562-5901.,1562-5901. |
Citation | 51 S.W.2d 280 |
Parties | AMERICAN EMPLOYERS' INS. CO. et al. v. RODDY et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Will C. Thompson and Thompson, Knight, Baker & Harris, all of Dallas, Tom P. Scott, Trippet, Richey & Sheehy and Sleeper, Boynton & Kendall, all of Waco, and J. B. Talley and John B. Daniel, both of Temple, for plaintiffs in error.
A. L. Curtis, of Belton, and Walker Saulsbury and Cox & Brown, all of Temple, for defendants in error.
On May 30, 1928, S. E. Roddy and wife, as parties of the first part, entered into a certain building contract with Ray Phillips, as party of the second part, under which contract the latter became bound to construct a building to be used by the Roddys as a home, on a lot in the city of Temple belonging to the Roddys. The agreed contract price of the work was $31,250, and Phillips agreed to furnish all labor and material for said work. It was provided in the building contract that the Roddys were to execute to Phillips a note of even date, for said contract price, and that same was to mature and be payable in installments as follows:
Contemporaneously with the execution of said building contract, the Roddys executed to Phillips a note for the contract price of $31,250, which note was made payable in installments as provided in the building contract. The note expressly refers to the building contract, and the above-quoted provisions of said contract are embodied in the note.
In the building contract the Roddys, for the purpose of securing the payment of said note, in accordance with its terms, gave a mechanic's lien on said lot and improvements. Said contract was duly filed for record on June 6, 1928, and duly recorded in the mechanic's lien records of Bell county, where said property was situated. The building contract provided that Phillips should give a bond, payable to the owners, in the sum of $15,000, conditioned that he (Phillips) "will well and truly and faithfully perform each of the covenants and conditions in this contract agreeably to said plans and specifications." In connection with the said building contract, Ray Phillips, as principal, and the American Employers' Insurance Company, as surety, executed a bond which, after reference to said building contract, provides as follows:
At the time the above bond was executed, Phillips executed to the insurance company an assignment in writing, reading partly as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parliament Ins. Co. v. L. B. Foster Co.
...See Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. v. Texas Sand & Gravel Co., supra; Mosher Mfg. Co. v. Equitable Surety Co., supra; American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Roddy, 51 S.W.2d 280 (Tex.Comm'n App.1932, holding approved); Wm. Cameron & Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York, supra; Bill Curphy Co. v.......
-
Texas Community Bank, N.A. v. Witte Investment Group, Ltd., No. 09-05-054 CV (Tex. App. 2/15/2007)
...generally given to the assignee who first received the assignment, even when the first assignment is not recorded. See Am. Employer's Ins. Co. v. Roddy, 51 S.W.2d 280, 283 (Tex. Com. App. 1932, no writ). In this case, Witte collaterally assigned the Carlisle note and lien to Lincoln on Marc......
-
Knox v. Ball
...intended for the benefit of third parties. Mosher Mfg. Co. v. Equitable Surety Co., Tex.Com.App., 229 S.W. 318; American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Roddy, Tex.Com.App., 51 S.W.2d 280; Wm. Cameron & Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York, Tex.Com.App., 55 S.W.2d 1032; Metropolitan Casualty Ins. ......
-
Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. Bellmead State Bank of Waco, 16604
...U.S. 405, 28 S.Ct. 389, 52 L.Ed. 547; Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 83 S.Ct. 232, 9 L.Ed.2d 190; American Employers' Ins. Co. v. Roddy, Tex.Com.App., 51 S.W.2d 280, opinion approved by the Supreme Court. It is further well settled in our law that the surety whose funds go to ......