American Healthcorp of Vero Beach, Inc. v. Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services

Decision Date22 May 1986
Docket NumberNo. 67448,67448
Citation488 So.2d 824,11 Fla. L. Weekly 231
Parties11 Fla. L. Weekly 231 AMERICAN HEALTHCORP OF VERO BEACH, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Michael J. Cherniga, of Roberts, Baggett, LaFace & Richard, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

M. Stephen Turner and William L. Hyde, of Culpepper, Pelham, Turner & Mannheimer, Tallahassee, for respondent.

Kenneth F. Hoffman of Oertel & Hoffman, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Indian River Co. Hosp. Dist.

James C. Hauser, of Messer, Vickers, Caparello, French & Madsen, Tallahassee, amicus curiae for Humana, Inc. d/b/a Sebastian River Medical Center, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. American Healthcorp, 471 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). In denying American Healthcorp's motion for rehearing, the district court certified the following question:

Is the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, by reason of the language in section 381.494(8)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1982), providing that if the department fails to take certain action within the time specified therein, that the applicant "may take appropriate legal action, including relief pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act," exempted from the general language of section 120.60(2), Florida Statutes (1981), requiring issuance of a license if an agency fails to act within the time specified therein?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We answer the certified question in the affirmative, and adopt the majority opinion of the First District Court of Appeal.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Scates v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1992
    ...terms. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. American Healthcorp., 471 So.2d 1312, 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA1985), adopted, 488 So.2d 824 (Fla.1986). In such a case, the more narrowly drawn statute operates as an exception to or qualification of the general terms of the more comprehensiv......
  • Alford v. G. Pierce Woods Memorial Hosp., 91-3297
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 7, 1993
    ...of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. American Healthcorp of Vero Beach, Inc., 471 So.2d 1312, 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), opinion adopted, 488 So.2d 824 (Fla.1986). As an example, Professor Ehrhardt observes: "The Florida Legislature has enacted special limitations on the qualifications of experts in......
  • Fletcher v. Fletcher
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 1991
    ...more general terms, See Department of HRS v. American Healthcorp, 471 So.2d 1312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), opinion approved and adopted, 488 So.2d 824 (Fla.1986), is inapplicable in this instance. It must be remembered that there are various kinds of disability benefits other than VA benefits in......
  • McClelland v. Cool
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 28, 1989
    ...& Rehabilitative Services v. American Healthcorp of Vero Beach, Inc., 471 So.2d 1312, n. 2, 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), approved, 488 So.2d 824 (Fla.1986). The applicable language in the Workers' Compensation Law became effective July 1, 1978. Ch. 78-300, §§ 2, 25, Laws of Fla. The sovereign ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT