American Ins. Co. of Tex. v. Neal, 5-2630
Decision Date | 05 March 1962 |
Docket Number | No. 5-2630,5-2630 |
Citation | 234 Ark. 784,354 S.W.2d 741 |
Parties | AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. Myrtle E. NEAL, Appellee. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Paul K. Roberts, Warren, Percy C. Fewell, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.
Clint Huey, Warren, for appellee.
The appellee brought this action to recover from the appellant a sum of money which she alleged was due under a 1955 insurance policy for expenses incurred by her in connection with hospital confinement and surgery in October, 1960.
The appellant, insurer, answered and denied liability on the grounds that the physical conditions which required hospitalization and surgery did not originate after October 20, 1955, which was six months after the effective date of its policy. The clauses under which this defense is interposed are as follows:
'PART A HOSPITAL EXPENSE BENEFITS
'(c) Sickness, the cause of which originates more than six months after the effective date of this policy and which requires surgery;
* * *
* * *
'EXCEPTIONS REDUCTIONS WAITING PERIODS
The proof in this case discloses that an operation was performed on the appellee for anterior and posterior perineal repair; that appellee filed a claim for hospitalization; and that appellee signed two forms in regard to her claim which were her Claimant's Statements--Hospital Coverage, and Individual Hospital Insurance Form, in which she designated the date of her first symptoms as July, 1947. It is evident that in 1947 the appellee underwent some treatment for the relief of certain complications. We are indebted to the appellant for an enlightening dissertation on the ills of women instant to childbirth, but whatever the 1947 treatment was designed to relieve seems to have been effective for the appellee states that she had not been troubled with the condition for which an operation was required until 'the tomato season of 1960', which we interpret as July, 1960, at which date the policy was in force.
We think the facts in this case bring it squarely within the rule announced in State National Life Insurance Company v. Stamper, 228 Ark. 1128, 312 S.W.2d 441, wherein we had the following facts:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kirk v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co.
...sickness or disease falling within the coverage of the policy." Id. at 126, 412 S.W.2d at 292. See also American Ins. Co. of Tex. v. Neal, 234 Ark. 784, 786, 354 S.W.2d 741, 743 (1962) (Stamper case in line with weight of authority that "condition should be deemed to have had its inception ......
-
Old Equity Life Ins. Co. v. Crumby
...view. These cases are: State National Life Insurance Company v. Stamper, 228 Ark. 1128, 312 S.W.2d 441; American Insurance Company of Texas v. Neal, 234 Ark. 784, 354 S.W.2d 741; and United Insurance Company of America v. Wall, 233 Ark. 554, 345 S.W.2d 927. In the Stamper case, Mrs. Stamper......
-
Life & Cas. Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. Nicholson, 5--4854
...228 Ark. 1128, 312 S.W.2d 441; United Insurance Co. of America v. Wall, 233 Ark. 554, 345 S.W.2d 927; American Insurance Co. of Texas v. Neal, 234 Ark. 784, 354 S.W.2d 741; Old Equity Life Insurance Co. v. Crumby, 241 Ark. 982, 411 S.W.2d 292; and Lincoln Income Life Insurance Company v. Mi......
-
Lincoln Income Life Ins. Co. v. Milton
...the issues now presented: State Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. Stamper, 228 Ark. 1128, 312 S.W.2d 441 (1958), and American Ins. Co. of Texas v. Neal, 234 Ark. 784, 354 S.W.2d 741 (1962). Each case affirmed a judgment for the plaintiff. In the Stamper case the insured, during most of her life, had ha......