American Intern. Realty, Inc. v. Southeast First Nat. Bank of Miami

Decision Date23 April 1985
Docket NumberNo. 83-2431,83-2431
Citation10 Fla. L. Weekly 1026,468 So.2d 383
Parties10 Fla. L. Weekly 1026 AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL REALTY, INC., a Florida corporation, and Timothy S. Brumlik, Appellants, v. SOUTHEAST FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, an association organized and existing under the laws of the United States, now known as Southeast Bank, N.A., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard A. Sherman, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Britton, Cohen, Cassel, Kaufman & Schantz and Arthur M. Simon and John Britton, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellants seek review of an adverse summary final judgment awarding the appellee triple damages in an action alleging breach of contract and civil theft.

American International Realty, Inc. maintained a checking account at Southeast Bank. The only signatory on the account was the corporation president, Timothy Brumlik. On or about September 4, 1981, Brumlik executed a check on the account in the amount of $17,379 payable to Paine Webber. The check was to pay for stock personally purchased by Brumlik. There were insufficient funds in the account and an overdraft was created when Southeast Bank made payment on the check. When notified of the overdraft, Brumlik said he thought there were sufficient funds in the account to cover the check but that he would make arrangements to cover it. Payment was never made to Southeast Bank on the overdraft. It filed the instant action seeking damages for breach of contract against American and triple damages against Brumlik for civil theft pursuant to § 812.035(7), Florida Statutes (1981). 1 The defendants answered and raised several affirmative defenses. The trial court entered a summary final judgment finding American International Realty, Inc., indebted to the bank for the amount of $18,031.06. 2 Brumlik was found to "knowingly obtain or use or endeavor to obtain or use the property of the Plaintiff in the form of cash in the sum of $17,379 with the intent to permanently deprive the Plaintiff of its right to said property ... as prohibited by Florida Statute 812.014," 3 and "that pursuant to Florida Statute 812.035 Plaintiff is entitled to recover threefold the actual damages which is $17,379.00, attorneys fees and costs of this litigation".

Thereafter the trial court assessed attorney's fees in the amount of $8,700.00.

We affirm the summary judgment as relates to Count 1 in the amount of $17,379 plus interest as a compensatory loss. 4 We reverse the judgment on the civil theft count. 5

At the time of opening the account the parties entered a written contract, a portion of which reads as follows:

"Overdrafts. If you write a check for more money than you have available in your account, you'll be overdrawn and we have the right to return the check. We are not required to permit overdrafts, but if we do, you agree that we may charge interest on the amount of the overdraft at the highest rate permitted by law."

Upon the bank receiving the overdrawn check, it had the option to either return it marked "drawn against insufficient funds" or honoring it and considering it a loan to the depositor. The bank unilaterally opted for the latter course. It so notified the depositor and when it was not paid, brought the instant action. The bank was limited, under the circumstances of this case, to recovery of the amount advanced, 6 plus interest, and attorney's fees.

Because the attorney's fee award was based on the entire amount recovered, some $80,000, it is set aside and should be recomputed based on the ultimate recovery of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Rosen v. Marlin
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 March 1986
    ...that a simple breach of contract is the equivalent of theft under § 812.014. In fact, American International Realty, Inc. v. Southeast First National Bank, 468 So.2d 383 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985), holds to the contrary. There, a bank customer wrote a check on an account in which there were ins......
  • Stramaglia v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 8 July 1992
    ...Surgical Technologies, Inc. v. Automated Instruments, Inc., 777 F.2d 1504 (11th Cir.1985); American Int'l Realty, Inc. v. Southeast First Nat'l Bank, 468 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). See also Douglas v. Braman Porsche-Audi, Inc., 451 So.2d 1038, 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Belford Trucking Co......
  • Fahey v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 10 December 2012
    ...whether a defendant had criminal intent should normally be left to the fact finder. Am. Int'l Realty, Inc. v. Se. First Nat. Bank of Miami, 468 So. 2d 383, 384 n.5 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985). While the Defendants did not return Fahey's escrow surplus to her, they did apply the escrow surplu......
  • Regions Bank v. Kaplan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • 18 April 2016
    ...held that a refusal to pay for one overdraft cannot be enforced by a conversion action. See American International Realty, Inc. v. Southeast First National Bank, 468 So.2d 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). The Court understands this claim to be a common law claim for conversion of money, not a claim ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT