American Motorists Ins. Co. v. McMullen
Decision Date | 17 April 1980 |
Docket Number | No. 8436,8436 |
Citation | 598 S.W.2d 386 |
Parties | AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Douglas J. McMULLEN, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
David W. Ledyard, Beaumont, for appellant.
Thomas J. Swearingen, Port Arthur, for appellee.
This is a Worker's Compensation case. The parties will be referred to as they were below. Plaintiff, Douglas J. McMullen, injured the fingertips of his index, ring, and little fingers.
A jury failed to find that plaintiff received an injury to his hand but did find that his injuries extended to and affected his right hand. Judgment for partial, temporary disability to the hand followed, from which the insurer brings this appeal.
The defendant tendered the following instruction, which was refused by the trial court, and which is the subject of its second point of error:
"An injury to a specific member does not 'extend to and affect' other parts of the body if the use or attempted use of the injured member merely results in pain or other subjective complaints in such other parts of the body without producing damage or harm to the physical structure of such other parts."
In Travelers Insurance Company v. Marmolejo, 383 S.W.2d 380, 382 (Tex.1964), the court said:
And, in Texas Employers' Insurance Association v. Shannon, 462 S.W.2d 559, 562 (Tex.1970), the now Chief Justice of our Supreme Court, speaking for the Court, said:
"The fact that pain alone (as distinguished from an extension of the injury) extends from an injury to a specific member of the body into the body does not make the injury a general one and will not support a finding of general incapacity."
Of course, in the case at bar, we are dealing with extension to the hand, and not a general injury, but the principle is the same.
It is not very often these days that an appellate court will reverse a trial court for the failure to give an explanatory instruction. See Union Oil Company of California v. Richard, 536 S.W.2d 955 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1975, no writ).
But, in the instant case, the instruction was " 'necessary to aid the jury in their factual...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Houston General Ins. Co. v. Hamilton
...See Texas General Indemnity Co. v. Glover, 612 S.W.2d 622 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1980, writ ref'd n. r. e.); American Motorist Insurance Co. v. McMullen, 598 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1980, no writ). See also, Members Mutual Insurance Co. v. Muckelroy, 523 S.W.2d 77 (Tex.Civ.App.-Ho......
-
Texas General Indem. Co. v. Glover, 8567
...properly on the law relating to the extension of an injury to a specific member of the body to another member. See American Motorists Ins. Co. v. McMullen, 598 S.W.2d 386 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1980, no writ), wherein we quoted the instruction suggested in 2 Texas Pattern Jury Charges, § 26......