American Olean Tile Company v. Zimmerman, Civ. No. 2979.
Decision Date | 09 September 1970 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 2979. |
Citation | 317 F. Supp. 150 |
Parties | AMERICAN OLEAN TILE COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Ralph E. ZIMMERMAN, Jr., et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii |
H. William Burgess, Don Jeffrey Gelber, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff.
Thomas L. Mui, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants.
DECISION ON MOTION TO QUASH GARNISHEE SUMMONSES
The defendants here, Ralph and Mary Zimmerman and A-1 Tile of Hawaii, Inc., have moved to quash the garnishee summonses that have issued against them on the grounds that the defendants' property has been taken without due process of law. American Olean Tile Company is suing the defendants to collect the purchase price for tile and other building materials sold by Pomona Tile Manufacturing Corporation, subsequently merged into American Olean, to A-1 Tile of California, Inc., and A-1 Tile of Hawaii. American Olean alleges that the Zimmermans were using the two A-1 corporations as their alter egos. American Olean has garnished A-1 Tile of Hawaii's regular checking account and its payroll account, approximately $9,800 total in both accounts, and also has garnished payments, about $11,900 net, due A-1 Tile on completed contracts. Ralph Zimmerman filed an affidavit that the garnishment worked great hardship upon the corporation. All the garnishments here were obtained pursuant to and in compliance with Hawaii law, H. R.S. § 652-1.
As the Supreme Court said in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 263, 90 S.Ct. 1011, 1018, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1969):
For over 100 years Hawaii has legislated upon the "Garnishee Process to Facilitate the Collection of Debts", and the basic processes as embodied in H.R.S. Ch. 652, Garnishment, are the same as found in the Act of 1876, "To Consolidate and Amend the Law Relating to the Garnishee Process to Facilitate the Collection of Debts." Under Hawaiian law the goods, effects, debts due or monies owed a debtor may be garnisheed by a creditor on a summons issued before judgment. Since 1890, Hawaii has recognized wages as meriting separate and distinct treatment under the garnishment laws.1
Hawaii does not demand that the plaintiff creditor file any bond before the garnishee process is issued, but it does provide means by which the debtor may secure a release of any garnisheed funds which may exceed the amount claimed. § 652-1(d). It also provides that if a debtor files a surety bond for the amount of the claimed debt, plus costs, etc., the fund garnisheed may be released. § 652-1(a), as amended by Act 86 of the Laws of 1970.2
The movant here urges that under Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp., 395 U.S. 337, 89 S.Ct. 1820, 23 L.Ed.2d 349 (1969), this court is mandated to hold the garnishment law of Hawaii as violative of the due process clause. This court does not find Sniadach as compelling any such action. To the contrary, on this very point, the Supreme Court said:
(Emphasis added.)...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lebowitz v. Forbes Leasing and Finance Corporation
...954 (S.D.Fla. 1970), probable jurisdiction noted, 401 U.S. 906, 91 S.Ct. 893, 27 L.Ed.2d 804 (Feb. 22, 1971); American Olean Tile Co. v. Zimmerman, 317 F.Supp. 150 (D. Hawaii 1970); Young v. Ridley, 309 F. Supp. 1308 (D.D.C.1970); Termplan Inc. v. Superior Court, 105 Ariz. 270, 463 P.2d 68 ......
-
Fuentes v. Shevin Parham v. Cortese 8212 5039, 70 8212 5138
...Reeves v. Motor Contract Co., 324 F.Supp. 1011 (N.D.Ga.); Black Watch Farms v. Dick, 323 F.Supp. 100 (D.Conn.); Ameican Olean Tile Co. v. Zimmerman, 317 F.Supp. 150 (D.Hawaii); Young v. Ridley, 309 F.Supp. 1308 (D.C.); Termplan, Inc. v. Superior Court of Maricopa County, 105 Ariz. 270, 463 ......
-
Magro v. Lentini Bros. Moving and Storage Co.
...645 (D.Md.1971); (b) Garnishment: Tucker v. Burton, 319 F.Supp. 567 (D.C.D.C.1970) (Three judge court); American Olean Tile Co. v. Zimmerman, 317 F.Supp. 150 (D.Hawaii 1970); Lynch v. Household Finance Co., 318 F.Supp. 1111 (D.Conn.1970) (Three judge court) prob. juris. noted 401 U.S. 935, ......
-
Olympic Forest Products, Inc. v. Chaussee Corp.
......and . St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Respondent. . No. 42378. . Supreme Court of ... been evolved through centuries of Anglo-American constitutional history and civilization, 'due ... E.g., American Olean Tile Co. v. Zimmerman, 317 F.Supp. 150 . Page ......