American Standard Ins. Co. v. Bittick

Decision Date13 May 2003
Docket NumberNo. WD 61784.,WD 61784.
PartiesAMERICAN STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN, Respondent, v. Larry D. BITTICK, Appellant Pro Se.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Larry D. Bittick, Cameron, pro se.

Carol F. Walsh, Kansas City, for respondent.

Before: HOWARD, P.J., LOWENSTEIN and HARDWICK, JJ.

LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

Appellant Larry Bittick alleges the circuit court erred in denying his Motion to Set Aside a Default Judgment. We dismiss the appeal, for lack of appellate jurisdiction, because the circuit court failed to enter a final judgment.

On December 22, 1998, American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin ("American Standard") filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment seeking a determination of whether it had a duty to further defend or indemnify Bittick under his automobile insurance policy.1 Bittick failed to respond to the petition, and the circuit court entered default judgment for American Standard on March 5, 1999.

On November 1, 1999, Bittick filed a Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. The circuit court denied the motion in an "Order" entered July 24, 2002. Bittick thereafter filed a "nunc pro tunc" motion requesting that the order be correctly denominated as a final judgment. The court did not rule on the motion. Bittick filed a Notice of Appeal on August 19, 2002.

On appeal, Bittick alleges four points of error and seeks reversal of the circuit court's order denying his Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. Before considering these points, we must determine our authority to hear the merits of this appeal. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hart, 41 S.W.3d 504, 508 (Mo.App. W.D. 2000). Although neither party has raised the issue, we are required to ascertain sua sponte if the jurisdictional prerequisite of a final judgment has been met. Bush Constr. Mach., Inc. v. Kansas City Factory Outlets, L.L.C., 37 S.W.3d 852, 854 (Mo. App. W.D.2001).

Pursuant to Section 512.020, RSMo 2000, an aggrieved party has a right to appeal from a final judgment or from any special order entered after final judgment. A judgment is entered when a writing signed by the judge and denominated "judgment" or "decree" is filed. Rule 74.01. Appellate jurisdiction is contingent upon the existence of a final judgment. See Bush, 37 S.W.3d at 854.

In determining our jurisdiction, we must consider whether the circuit court's order denying Bittick's Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment constituted a final judgment or special order entered after such judgment. Bittick filed his Motion to Set Aside more than thirty days after entry of the default judgment—that is, after the judgment was final pursuant to Rule...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 25 Enero 2005
    ...nature of this proceeding requires the entry of a new final judgment to invoke appellate jurisdiction." Am. Std. Ins. Co. v. Bittick, 112 S.W.3d 55, 57 (Mo.App. W.D.2003) (quoting Popular Leasing, 57 S.W.3d at 878). Accordingly, a Rule 74.05(d) "motion to set aside default filed after the d......
  • State v. Callies
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 26 Diciembre 2012
    ...appellate jurisdiction. Lake Osage Condominium Ass'n v. Prewitt, 179 S.W.3d 331, 335 (Mo.App.2005) (quoting American Standard Ins. Co. v. Bittick, 112 S.W.3d 55, 56–57 (Mo.App.2003)). To be a judgment, the order must comply with Rule 74.01(a) and leave nothing for future determination, be s......
  • Heintz Elec. v. Tri Lakes Interiors
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 10 Marzo 2006
    ...thirty days after entry of the default judgment—that is, after the judgment was final pursuant to Rule 75.01." Am. Std. Ins. Co. v. Bittick, 112 S.W.3d 55, 56-57 (Mo.App.2003). "`When such a motion is filed after the default judgment has become final, it is treated as an independent proceed......
  • Spino v. Bhakta
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 Noviembre 2005
    ... ... Std. Ins. Co. v. Bittick, 112 S.W.3d 55, 57 (Mo.App.2003) (citations and internal ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT