American Surety Co. of New York v. Bay City Cattle Co.
Decision Date | 11 December 1924 |
Docket Number | (No. 8566.) |
Parties | AMERICAN SURETY CO. OF NEW YORK et al. v. BAY CITY CATTLE CO. et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Action by the Bay City Cattle Company and others against the American Surety Company of New York and the National Cattle Loan Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error. Affirmed.
Vinson, Elkins, Wood & Sweeton, Campbell, Myer, Simmons & Hawkins, and Fred R. Switzer, all of Houston, for plaintiffs in error.
Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood, Barksdale Stevens, and Winston Carter, all of Houston, for defendants in error.
The facts underlying this cause were as follows:
J. C. Hybarger, an extensive operator in the buying and selling of cattle, purchased in Florida at least 740 head of cattle in accordance with an agreement between him and the National Cattle Loan Company, whereby it advanced money to its bank to pay drafts drawn by him to cover the purchase price of and transportation charges on the cattle to Texas; as security for the money so advanced, Hybarger attached to, or wrote on the drafts drawn therefor, a conveyance of the cattle from him to the bank for the benefit of the loan company; it was further the habitual practice between him and the loan company that, when cattle were thus bought by him and collected together, he would then execute a chattel mortgage on them to it to secure this money.
After the cattle were so purchased, Hybarger shipped them direct from Florida to the pasture of the Bay City Cattle Company in Brazoria county, Tex., where they were placed on July 23, 1920, under a contract between him and the cattle company, by which he was to pay pasturage on them at the rate of 35 cents per head per month; the cattle company at the time knowing nothing of his prior transaction with the loan company and being under the impression that the cattle were owned by him.
Thereafter, on August 21, 1920, after they had so been in the cattle company's pasture, and had been cared for by it since the preceding July 23d, Hybarger, who was then a resident of San Antonio, Bexar county, Tex., executed at Houston and delivered a chattel mortgage on these cattle to the loan company to secure his notes to it maturing in December of the same year in the total sum of $35,540, which instrument, however, was not filed for record in Brazoria county, where the cattle were located, until September 7, 1920, and of which execution and filing the cattle company had no actual knowledge or notice, nor were they apprised of any claim under the mortgage, until in April, 1922.
On December 13, 1920, Hybarger sold and removed from the pasture 210 head of the cattle, about 70 had by that time escaped or died, and the remaining 460 head remained in there until April 20, 1922; none of the charges for pasturage or other services rendered were ever paid.
On April 20, 1922, the two companies referred to, the loan company and the cattle company, the former claiming the right to take and appropriate the remaining 460 head of the cattle pursuant to the terms of its chattel mortgage, and the latter asserting an agistor's or an equitable lien on them to secure the pasturage, branding, dipping, and vaccination charges thereon, amounting in all to $4,100.66, agreed that the controversy should be settled in a suit between them to be filed by the cattle company, whereupon the loan company executed a bond to the cattle company, with the American Surety Company of New York as surety, agreeing in effect to pay such of these charges as the loan company was either held liable to it for, or as might be determined to carry a superior lien on the cattle to the loan company's claim. The cattle were then surrendered to the loan company and this suit followed, being filed by the cattle company as plaintiff against the loan and surety companies as defendants, declaring upon the charges before described, and asserting both an equitable and a statutory lien on the cattle, superior to any claim under the chattel mortgage.
The cause was tried before the court without a jury; judgment first being entered in favor of defendants in error for $518, as for pasturage on the cattle for the first two months only, from July 23 to September 23, 1920, but later in the same term and on further argument, this decree was set aside and a judgment was entered for defendant in error for the full amount they sued for, $4,100.66, with interest from its date. From that recovery against them, the loan and surety companies prosecute this writ of error. The court below filed these conclusions of fact and law:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. De Baca
...contrary to this conclusion. The two cases cited by appellant and upon which he mainly relies are American Surety Co. of New York v. Bay City Cattle Co., Tex.Civ. App., 268 S.W. 247, writ refused; and Houston Nat. Exchange Nat. Bank v. De Blanc, Tex.Civ.App., 247 S.W. 897. We have examined ......
-
In re McCrory Stores Corporation, 59.
...was not intended to create liens or regulate or determine priority as between different lienors. American Surety Co., etc., v. Bay City Cattle Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 268 S. W. 247, 250. We hold that the trustee was entitled to retain the $1,958.57 of subrents which accrued prior to February 1......
-
Fritz Motor Co. v. Gabert, 12472.
...(Tex. Civ. App.) 13 S.W.(2d) 121; McCarthey v. North Texas Loan Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 101 S. W. 835. In American Surety Co. v. Bay City Cattle Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 268 S. W. 247, 251 (writ of error refused), it was held that the priority of a mortgage lien was waived in favor of a claim for ......
-
Skaggs v. Currey
...merely for a part thereof." In support of this presentment, the sole authority cited is the holding of this Court in American Surety Co. v. Bay City Cattle Co., 268 S.W. 247, writ of error refused, which is so presented as being "almost on all fours with the case at bar", and conclusive of ......