American Tel. & Tel. Co. of Massachusetts v. McDonald

Decision Date28 November 1930
Citation273 Mass. 324,173 N.E. 502
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
PartiesAMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. OF MASSACHUSETTS v. McDONALD et al.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Superior Court, Hampden County; Edward T. Broadhurst, Judge.

Suit by the American Telephone & Telegraph Company of Massachusetts against William F. McDonald and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

Affirmed.

J. S. Kane, of Springfield, for appellants.

C. H. Beckwith, of Springfield, for appellee.

WAIT, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Superior Court which enjoins the defendants perpetually from interfering with the plaintiff's maintenance and enjoyment of a toll cable hung from poles on a strip of land of the defendants; from injuring, removing or destroying the poles to which the cable is attached; from cutting or otherwise injuring the cable; and from interfering with the entry by servants of the plaintiff upon the strip of land for the purpose of protecting, adequately and properly, its property there from injury by the elements.

In 1913 one James P. McDonald did ‘grant, bargain, sell and convey’ to the New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, habendum to it, ‘its successors and assigns for their own use and behoof forever’ ‘the right to erect, operate and maintain lines of telephone and telegraph including the necessary poles and fixtures upon and over’ certain described premises. The conveyance was by deed, duly recorded, executed by McDonald and his wife, who joined to release any interest she had ‘in the rights and easements herein conveyed.’ The deed set out: ‘The above granted rights being more particularly described as the exclusive right to erect and maintain poles with the wires thereon with the necessary guys and supports and the right to cut down and keep trimmed all trees and bushes as the grantee may desire within a strip of land thirty (30) feet in width upon and over said described premises, the location of said strip to be determined by, and to become permanent upon, the erection of the poles in said lines of telephone and telegraph with permission to enter upon said strip and upon said premises for access thereto for all the above purposes.’ The grantee agreed to pay for all damage to crops caused by negligence of its employees while engaged in work of the company on the land.

The defendants are the present owners of the land subject to the rights thus created. The grantee put up poles, strung wires upon them and hung a cable from a wire supported by cross arms, to form a part of its toll route between Springfield and Worcester. In 1928, it granted by instrument under seal, to the American Telephone and Telegraph Company of Massachusetts, the plaintiff here, ‘the right to erect, operate and maintain a telephone toll cable with the necessary fixtures, upon all the poles of the grantor located on private...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. Krohn
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • November 5, 2002
    ...as evidenced by the specific reference to telegraph and telephone wires" in the 1940 easement); Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. of Mass. v. McDonald, 273 Mass. 324, 173 N.E. 502, 502-03 (1930) (concluding that easement granted for the purpose of maintaining "lines of telephone and telegraph'. could be ......
  • Cellco Partnership v. Shelby County
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • August 29, 2005
    ...its successors forever." The term "exclusive" does not mean "confined to use by the grantee alone." Am. Tel. and Tel. Co. of Mass. v. McDonald, 273 Mass. 324, 173 N.E. 502, 502-03 (1930). "Clearly guests, invitees and tenants are among those whose use of a road or way permitting access to a......
  • Baseball Pub. Co. v. Bruton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1938
    ...v. Burbank, 12 Allen 459,90 Am.Dec. 161;Carville v. Commonwealth, 192 Mass. 570, 78 N.E. 735;American Telephone & Telegraph Co. of Massachusetts v. McDonald, 273 Mass. 324, 173 N.E. 502;Jones v. Stevens, 276 Mass. 318, 324, 177 N.E. 91, 76 A.L.R. 591. We see no objection to treating the wri......
  • Baseball Pub. Co. v. Bruton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 30, 1938
    ... ... MATTIE B. BRUTON. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.December 30, 1938 ...        February 9, ... 259 Mass ... 103 , 107. Nelson v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co ... 270 Mass. 471, 479. A lease ... of ... Massachusetts v. McDonald, 273 Mass. 324 ... Jones v ... Stevens, 276 Mass. 318 , ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT