Ames v. Lake Superior & Mississippi Railroad Co.
Decision Date | 11 January 1875 |
Citation | 21 Minn. 241 |
Parties | OAKES AMES & another, Executors, <I>vs.</I> LAKE SUPERIOR & MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD COMPANY. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
Plaintiffs brought this action in the court of common pleas for Ramsey county, to restrain the defendant from entering upon land of the plaintiffs in that county, and constructing its railroad thereon. In their complaint, they allege that the defendant is a corporation organized under the general railway law of the state, and also assuming to act as a corporation, under and by virtue of the special legislation hereinafter mentioned. The defendant, in its answer, asserts its right to take the plaintiffs' land for the purpose of its road, by virtue of such special legislation, and of proceedings for condemnation duly taken as therein provided.
At the trial, before Hall, J., it was admitted that the land in question was necessary for the purposes of defendant's railway, that the plaintiffs claimed no relief on the ground that the defendant entered upon their land before securing compensation, and that the defendant claims no corporate rights, except under the special legislation hereinafter mentioned. It was further admitted that in the year 1857, Minnesota extended to the Missouri river, and Nebraska from the Missouri river to the Rocky Mountains; that Nebraska extended as far north as, and farther south, than Minnesota; that Cheyenne City was one degree north of Duluth, at the junction of the Cheyenne river and the Red River of the North. The special legislation under which defendant claims is as follows:
On May 23, 1857, the legislative assembly of the then Territory of Minnesota passed an act entitled "An act to incorporate the Nebraska & Lake Superior Railroad Company," (Laws 1857, ex. sess., ch. 93,) in which it is enacted as follows:
etc.
etc. Sec. 5 prescribes certain powers and duties of the board of directors.
Sec. 7 authorizes the company to build its railroad across highways and navigable streams.
Sec. 8 gives the company a right of way to the width of two hundred feet, and the right to enter upon lands, etc.
Sec. 9 prescribes the proceedings to be taken by the company for the taking of private property for the purposes of its railroad, and contains the usual provision for a trial by jury, on appeal from the award of the commissioners.
Sec. 10 gives the corporation the power to consolidate with any other company having the same general direction or location, etc.
Sec. 11 authorizes the company to borrow money, and execute bonds, mortgages, etc.
Sec. 12 provides that lands granted by congress may be granted directly to the company, etc.
Sec. 13 gives the right to pass over connecting railroads, etc.
Sec. 14 provides that the company shall, if required, carry the United States mail.
Sec. 15 provides a penalty for wilful injury to the railroad.
Sec. 16 provides that conductors, etc., shall wear badges.
Sec. 17 provides that every locomotive shall carry a bell, which shall be rung, etc.
Prior to January 1, 1858, eighteen of the corporators above named notified the governor of the territory of their acceptance of the charter, and of their intention to proceed under its provisions. This notification bears date September 12, 1857, and was filed in the office of the secretary of the territory, on December 26, 1857.
It does not appear that the above named corporators, or any of them, ever took any further step to carry out the purposes of the act.
Minnesota was admitted into the Union in 1858, with a constitution which provides, art. 10, § 2, that "no corporations shall be formed under special acts, except for municipal purposes."
On March 8, 1861, the legislature of the State of Minnesota passed an act entitled "An act to amend an act entitled an act to incorporate the Nebraska and Lake Superior Railroad Company," (Sp. Laws, 1861, ch. 1,) in which it is enacted as follows:
etc., the remainder of the section following the language of § 1 of the act of 1857.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
League of Women Voters Minn. v. Ritchie
...doubt of the authority and duty of the court ... to declare such acts invalid, if repugnant to the constitution.” Ames v. Lake Superior & M.R. Co., 21 Minn. 241, 282 (1875). Put more fully by Chief Justice John Marshall: The question, whether an act, repugnant to the constitution, can becom......
-
Bigelow v. Draper
...Paige, Ch. 45; Peo. v. Smith, 21 N.Y. 595; Ex parte Reynolds, 44 Am. and Eng. R. R. Cases, 60; Willyard v. Hamilton, 7 Ohio 111; Ames v. Ry., 21 Minn. 241, 291; Hoppikus Com'rs, 16 Cal. 248; Great Falls Co. v. Garland, 25 F. 521. The question of the amount of damages is for the jury in this......
-
Hawley v. Wallace
...Whallon v. Bancroft, 4 Minn. 70 (109); St. Paul & Sioux City R. Co. v. Gardner, 19 Minn. 99 (132) 18 Am. Rep. 334; Ames v. Lake Superior & M.R. Co. 21 Minn. 241; Board of Co. Commrs. Mille Lacs County v. Morrison, 22 Minn. 178; Bruggerman v. True, 25 Minn. 123; In re Howes, 38 Minn. 403, 38......
-
State v. N. Pac. Ry. Co.
...and people for many years, is always entitled to receive great consideration from the courts.’ And see Ames v. Lake Superior & Miss. R. D. Co., 21 Minn. 241, at page 289. And see Green v. Knife Falls Boom Corp., 35 Minn. 161,27 N. W. 924;State v. Luther, 56 Minn. 156, 57 N. W. 464;State v. ......