Anderson/maltbie P'ship v. Levin, 2009-1671

Decision Date20 December 2010
Docket Number2009-1671
Citation2010 Ohio 4904,127 Ohio St.3d 178
PartiesAnderson/Maltbie Partnership v. Levin
CourtOhio Supreme Court
SLIP OPINIONS REPLACED BY OHIO OFFICIAL REPORTS VERSIONS

The official versions of the opinions listed below, which were previously released as slip opinions, have been published in the December 20, 2010 Ohio Official Reports advance sheet. These opinions should now be cited using the Ohio Official Reports citation format.

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Grace Cathedral, Inc. v. Testa
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • June 2, 2015
    ...that the language of the statute ‘clearly express[es] the exemption’ in relation to the facts of the claim." Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. Levin, 127 Ohio St.3d 178, 2010-Ohio-4904, 937 N.E.2d 547, ¶ 16, quoting Ares, Inc. v. Limbach, 51 Ohio St.3d 102, 104, 554 N.E.2d 1310 (1990). Thus t......
  • Cincinnati Golf Mgmt., Inc. v. Testa
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • June 27, 2012
    ...that the language of the statute ‘clearly express[es] the exemption’ in relation to the facts of the claim.” Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. Levin, 127 Ohio St.3d 178, 2010-Ohio-4904, 937 N.E.2d 547, ¶ 16, quoting Ares, Inc. v. Limbach, 51 Ohio St.3d 102, 104, 554 N.E.2d 1310 (1990). CGMI c......
  • Geneva Area Recreational, Educational & Athletic Trust v. Testa
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • April 27, 2016
    ...bore “the burden of proof * * * to show that the property is entitled to exemption.” R.C. 5715.271 ; see also Anderson/Maltbie Partnership v. Levin, 127 Ohio St.3d 178, 2010-Ohio-4904, 937 N.E.2d 547, ¶ 16 (“the onus is on the taxpayer to show that the language of the statute ‘clearly expre......
  • 250 Shoup Mill, L.L.C. v. Testa
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Ohio
    • July 20, 2016
    ...that the nonprofit and charitable character of the ownership arrangement decisively distinguishes this case from Anderson/Maltbie v. Levin, 127 Ohio St.3d 178, 2010-Ohio-4904, 937 N.E.2d 547, and that that arrangement should qualify the property for exemption under the public-schoolhouse ex......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT