Anderson v. Comm'r of Corr.

Decision Date23 April 2014
CitationAnderson v. Comm'r of Corr., 311 Conn. 945, 90 A.3d 976 (Conn. 2014)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesFred ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Kenneth Paul Fox, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Lawrence J. Tytla, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Fred Anderson's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 148 Conn.App. 641, 85 A.3d 1240, is denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Brooks v. Powers
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 26, 2016
    ...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 148 Conn. App. 641, 645, 85 A.3d 1240, cert. denied, 311 Conn. 945, 90 A.3d 976, cert. denied sub nom. Anderson v. Dzurenda, U.S. , 135 S. Ct. 201, 190 L. Ed. 2d 155 (2014). 16. Although Sestito created the immin......
  • State v. Hurdle
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 31, 2023
    ...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction , 148 Conn. App. 641, 645, 85 A.3d 1240, cert. denied, 311 Conn. 945, 90 A.3d 976, cert. denied sub nom. Anderson v. Dzurenda , 574 U.S. 883, 135 S. Ct. 201, 190 L. Ed. 2d 155 (2014). Similarly, it is the policy of t......
  • State v. Garcia
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 2017
    ...body, is bound by Supreme Court precedent and [is] unable to modify it" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 311 Conn. 945, 90 A.3d 976, cert. denied sub nom. Anderson v. Dzurenda , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 201, 190 L.Ed.2d 155 (2014).17 As part of its first claim, Afford als......
  • Dull v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 1, 2017
    ...of law, subject to plenary review. Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction , 148 Conn.App. 641, 644, 85 A.3d 1240, cert. denied, 311 Conn. 945, 90 A.3d 976, cert. denied sub nom. Anderson v. Dzurenda , U.S., –––U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 201, 190 L.Ed. 2d 155 (2014). On the basis of our review of ......
  • Get Started for Free