Anderson v. Love

Decision Date05 December 1933
Docket Number30829
Citation151 So. 366,169 Miss. 219
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesAnderson v. Love, Superintendent Of Banks.

1. BANKS AND BANKING.

Superintendent of banks need not formally declare bank in liquidation before suing stockholders for statutory liability, but need only make it reasonably appear that assets of bank will be insufficient to pay depositors (Code 1930, section 3815).

2. BANKS AND BANKING.

Stockholders of insolvent bank cannot set off their deposits with bank against their statutory liability, since such liability is not debt due bank by stockholders, but is security for benefit of depositors who are entitled thereto free of equities between bank and stockholders (Code 1930, section 3815).

3 STATUTES.

Erroneous construction placed on unambiguous statute relative to liability of bank stockholders by banking department which permitted stockholders to set off their deposits in insolvent bank against their liability held not binding on Supreme Court (Code 1930, section 3815).

4. APPEAL AND ERROR.

Set-off allowed appellants against claim of appellee who filed no cross-appeal thereto cannot be disturbed.

5. BANKS AND BANKING.

Stockholders who paid their double liability under trust agreement whereby bank delivered notes and securities to trustees who allocated part thereof to stockholders for whom trustees collected money on remainder and deposited money in same bank which subsequently was taken over by superintendent of banks, who brought suit against stockholders for statutory liability held not entitled, in such suit, to set off money so deposited in bank by trustees (Code 1930, section 3815).

6. BANKS AND BANKING.

Superintendent of banks could join all bank stockholders in suit in equity to recover statutory liability from stockholders who were all proper parties thereto (Code 1930, sections 363, 3815).

7. BANKS AND BANKING.

Chancery court had jurisdiction over nonresident stockholder who was made party defendant to suit by superintendent of banks against all stockholders of bank to recover statutory liability from stockholders, absent contention that none of stockholders resided in county where suit was brought (Code 1930, sections 363, 3815).

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR. (Division A. Feb. 26, 1934.) [153 So 369. No. 30829.]

1. TRUSTS. Where power to revoke or modify trust is not expressly reserved, and creation of trust is not affected by fraud, duress, or mistake, settlor is without power to revoke or modify trust, even though created without consideration. 2. BANKS AND BANKING. Where stockholders in state bank, under resolution of directors, advanced money to retire doubtful assets, and bank assigned such doubtful assets to trustees for benefit of stockholders, entire proceeds of such assets which were collected and deposited in bank, notwithstanding only part of assets was allocated to trust, held proper set-off against stockholders' liability.

HON JAMES A. FINLEY, Chancellor.

Suit by J. S. Love, Superintendent of Banks, against F. F. Anderson and others, wherein defendants filed a cross-bill. From the decree, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

On suggestion of error.

Former judgment set aside in part, decree appealed from reversed, and decree rendered in accordance with opinion.

For former opinion, see 151 So. 366.

The resolution directed to be reported follows:

"A regular meeting of the board of directors of the Corinth Bank & Trust Company was held at the office of the Bank on the 12th day of June, 1928, the following members of the board being present: Mr. E. S. Candler, Chairman, A. M. Dickson, T A. Read, J. R. Hamm, and F. F. Anderson. The president, F. F. Anderson, presided and the Secretary was present and acting:

"The chairman announced that the principal business coming before the meeting was the matter of taking care of certain losses the bank has suffered, and explained that certain stockholders, would make contributions to save the bank, provided they should be reimbursed to the extent that collections might be made on the paper in which the losses have occurred, and should also be repaid out of the net earning of the bank in excess of ten per cent each year.

"The Chairman further explained that form of agreement covering the proposed plan to protect the bank had been prepared and he submitted the form to the meeting, whereupon Mr. A. M. Dickson offered the following resolution:

"'Be it resolved by the board of directors of the Corinth Bank & Trust Company that the president and secretary of this bank be, and they are hereby, authorized to execute for the bank and its name an agreement with certain stockholders in the form substantially, as follows:

"'Whereas, there are certain loans now being carried by the Corinth Bank & Trust Company, hereinafter called the bank, which have been criticised by the state banking department, and which it is proposed to retire with money advanced by certain of the stockholders of the bank for that purpose.

"'Whereas, the paper so to be retired should be held and collected for the use and benefit of the stockholder, pro rata, so contributing to the retirement of such questionable paper, and trustees are necessary for such holding and collecting and for the equitable distribution of whatever may be collected thereon; and

"'Whereas, the bank desires to bind itself, in consideration of the advancement of this said money by certain of its stockholders, to apply all of the net earnings of the bank, over and above not more than what would be necessary for a six per cent annual dividend, and not more than a four per cent annual addition to the fixed surplus, to the repayment of so much of the above mentioned advancements and four per cent interest per annum thereon, as may not be liquidated by and from collections, if any, that may be made upon the said paper so to be retired, until said advancements shall have been fully repaid, and trustees are necessary and convenient as an agency to receive the said funds from the bank and to make proper distribution thereof, pro rata, to the said contributing stockholders; and,

"'Whereas, F. F. Anderson, J. W. Gaulding and R. M Weaver are suitable and proper persons to be appointod as trustees for the above mentioned purposes and ought to be so designated:

"'Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises, the said Corinth Bank & Trust Company hereby designates and appoints the said F. F. Anderson, J. W. Gaulding and R. M. Weaver, Trustees, with full power, and it is hereby made their duty;---

"'(a) To receive and hold such paper as may be transferred to them by it, of the character herein above mentioned, and for the purposes herein expressed; to collect said transferred paper and apply the proceeds thereof to the payment, pro rata, of the several amounts advanced by the stockholders of the bank for the purpose of retiring such paper, together with four per cent interest per annum on such advancements; and

"'(b) To have and receive from the bank, at the end of each year, all its net earnings over and above the said six per cent dividend and four per cent addition to the surplus, and to pay the same, pro rata, to the stockholders who contribute to the said fund for retiring said questionable paper, until said contributions shall have been paid in full, together with interest thereon at the rate of four per cent per annum.

"'The said Corinth Bank & Trust Company hereby expressly agrees to transfer to said persons and their successors in trust, but without recourse on it, such of its paper as may be taken up by the contributions of its stockholders and in an amount, face value, equal to the aggregate of such contributions, to be held and dealt with by said trustees as herein stipulated and provided; and also that, at the end of each year, so long as same may be necessary, it will pay to the said trustees, for the uses aforesaid, all its net earnings except so much of such net earnings as may be necessary to pay an annual dividend of not more than six per cent, and except enough, also, to increase the surplus not over four per cent of the capital stock of each year. But it is clearly understood that the bank does not obligate itself to pay to said trustees anything whatever except out of its net earnings as same may be hereafter ascertained, after providing for all expenses and losses, and for dividends and additions to surplus, as herein set out.

"'And further it is agreed that if, at any time collections on the transferred paper and payments made from net earnings shall have reached a total equal to the advancements made by stockholders plus four per cent interest per annum thereon, such of the said paper as may not have been collected shall be returned to the bank and become its property.

"'The bank also further obligates itself to appoint a trustee, or trustees, to take the place of him, or them dying, resigning, or becoming unable or unwilling to act, and so often as same may be necessary, and all rights, powers and duties herein conferred upon the trustees named herein shall belong to their successors as well.

"'It is further agreed that the bank, in so far as it legally may, will treat the contributions made by the stockholders, as contemplated herein, as advancement on stock liability in the event the bank should fail or discontinue operation within twenty-four months from this date and on account of losses accrued or accruing in paper now in the bank's portfolio. This entire agreement is subject to the approval and concurrence of the superintendent of banks of the state of Mississippi which approval and concurrence will be evidenced by letter to be filed with the board of directors of this bank.

"'It is contemplated that each person making contributions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Carothers v. Love, Superintendent of Banks
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1934
    ...that the assets of the bank will be insufficient to pay its depositors. Gift v. Love, 164 Miss. 442, 144 So. 562, 86 A. L. R. 63; Anderson v. Love, supra. Until time, it has no ascertained, enforceable existence, and therefore has been contingent and not absolute--until that time it was a l......
  • Carothers v. Love
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 5, 1934
    ...that the assets of the bank will be insufficient to pay its depositors. Gift v. Love, 164 Miss. 442, 144 So. 562, 86 A. L. R. 63; Atnderson v. Love, supra. Until that time, it no ascertained, enforceable existence, and therefore has been contingent and not absolute---until that time it was ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT