Anderson v. State
Decision Date | 14 October 1938 |
Parties | ANDERSON v. STATE. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Ben C. Willard Judge.
George Anderson was convicted of unlawfully and feloniously assaulting another person with a deadly weapon with intent to kill, and of unlawfully possessing a pistol without having a license, and he brings error.
Affirmed.
COUNSEL William J. Pruitt, of Miami, and Julius F Parker, of Tallahassee, for plaintiff in error.
George Couper Gibbs, Atty. Gen., and Tyrus A. Norwood, Asst. Atty Gen., for the State.
On the 27th day of August, 1937, the County Solicitor of Dade County, Florida, filed in the Criminal Court of Record of said County an information charging George Anderson, on the 1st day of August, 1937, in Dade County Florida, with an unlawful and felonious assault upon one Manuel B. Phillips with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a pistol, with the intent to kill and murder the said Manuel B. Phillips. The second county of the information charged George Anderson with the unlawful possession of a pistol, without having license from the County Commissioners of Dade County, Florida, and that the said George Anderson was not a Sheriff, Deputy Sheriff, City or Town policeman or marshal, or any other officer within the meaning of the Statute. On the 10th day of March, 1938, the defendant George Anderson, was arraigned in the Criminal Court of Record on the said information and at the time of said arraignment interposed a plea in abatement directed to each count of the said information. The said plea in abatement was marked Exhibit 'A' and is as follows:
Second District.'
'[Seal.]
The State of Florida interposed a demurrer to the plea in abatement and the grounds thereof are, viz.:
'1. It affirmative appears from said Plea in Abatement that the defendant was caused to be arrested by an affidavit issued by a duly appointed, qualified and acting Justice of Peace acting in the District where said crime was committed.
'2. It affirmatively appears from said Plea in Abatement that a preliminary hearing was held at which witnesses testified and that prima facie at least such testimony was sufficient to prove the crime that the defendant was charged with.
'3. An affidavit having been filed in a court of competent jurisdiction, as required by law, setting out sufficient facts to constitute the crime charged, it was then not necessary for the County Solicitor to subpoena the witnesses before him and take any testimony concerning the offense.
The lower court, after argument of counsel, entered an order sustaining the demurrer as directed to the plea in abatement. The defendant was placed upon trial, a verdict of guilty was rendered, a ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bedami v. State
...only upon sworn testimony before him or upon an indictment of a grand jury certified to the criminal court. The case of Anderson v. State, 134 Fla. 290, 183 So. 735, 737, held that the statutes and constitution did not require that an information filed by the solicitor of a criminal court o......
-
Di Bona v. State, 1402
...of whether the evidence is adequate to support the filing of the information. Prevatt v. State, 135 Fla. 226, 184 So. 860; Anderson v. State, 134 Fla. 290, 183 So. 735. It is noted that even if the defendant is granted a preliminary hearing, and the committing magistrate discharges the defe......
-
Cortes v. State
... ... jurisdiction to proceed with said prosecution or impose a ... judgment in said cause?' ... The ... original information filed by the County Solicitor in this ... case was based solely upon testimony taken at a preliminary ... hearing before the County Judge. In Anderson v. State, ... Fla., 183 So. 735, decided at this term, the information ... filed by the County Solicitor was based on testimony taken ... before a Justice of the Peace. The defendant contended the ... information was void ab initio, but this Court held the ... constitutional provisions and ... ...
-
State ex rel. Hardy v. Blount, s. 41427--41431
...of whether the evidence is adequate to support the filing of the information. Prevatt v. State, 135 Fla. 226, 184 So. 860; Anderson v. State, 134 Fla. 290, 183 So. 735.' (p. As pointed out in Di Bona v. State, Supra, even if a defendant were granted a preliminary hearing and the committing ......