Anderson v. Twp. Bd. of Myrtle Twp.
Decision Date | 31 October 1881 |
Parties | ANDERSON, Appellant, v. THE TOWNSHIP BOARD OF MYRTLE TOWNSHIP. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Adair Circuit Court.--HON. J. W. HENRY, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
James Ellison for appellant.
W. R. McQoid and E. V. Wilson for respondent.
This is an appeal from certain proceedings instituted before the township board of Myrtle township, Knox county, under the act of March 24th, 1873, in relation to township organization, for the purpose of establishing a public road in said township. On appeal to the county court it was adjudged by that tribunal that the road sought to be established was of public utility, and that it be declared a public highway, as follows: “Beginning at the northwest corner of section 35 and the southwest corner of section 26, and running thence east on the section line between said sections 35 and 26 one mile, at which point it reaches and comes to the northwest corner of section 36 and the southwest corner of section 25, and to continue from said corner of sections 36 and 25 east on the section line between said sections 36 and 25 one mile, terminating at the northeast corner of section 26, where it intersects the road running north and south on the county line between Lewis and Knox counties; all of said road in township 62, range 10--the road to be forty feet wide; and that Alexander Anderson, plaintiff, be allowed damages in the sum of $30, after making due allowance for the advantages and disadvantages of said road to him; and that the action of the township board in the location of the road is hereby affirmed.” On appeal to the circuit court, the judgment of the county court was affirmed, and said road was established as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Gratiot v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
-
State ex rel. Palmer v. Elliff
... ... disregarded. See Anderson v. Township Board of Myrtle ... Township, 75 Mo. 57, where it was held ... ...
-
State ex rel. Palmer v. Elliff, 31707.
...misled no one and seemingly was not even noticed, we think it should be disregarded. See Anderson v. Township Board of Myrtle Township, 75 Mo. 57, where it was held that the circuit court on appeal had the undoubted right to correct a patent mistake in the description in a petition for a pu......
-
Walker v. Sundermeyer
...v. Dooley, 16 Mo.App. 441. Courts may in the trial of a cause on appeal correct a mistake in the record of an inferior court. Anderson v. Township, 75 Mo. 57. Under the liberal amendments authorized by Sec. 5561, Laws 1913, the action of the circuit court in allowing the commissioners to am......