Andrews v. Cassidy

Decision Date28 June 1886
Citation7 N.E. 545,142 Mass. 96
PartiesANDREWS and others v. CASSIDY and another.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

H.J. Edwards, for petitioners.

S.T. Harris, for respondents.

OPINION

C. ALLEN, J.

The only question is whether, within the meaning of Pub.St. c. 162, § 49, the examination of the debtor must be treated as pending up to the time of the announcement of the decision of the magistrate, so that the creditor was at liberty to file charges of fraud at any time before the announcement of the decision, although the hearing of evidence and arguments had closed, and the magistrate had continued the cause for the purpose of considering the questions of law and fact involved therein. And we are of the opinion that such an examination is still pending, until the announcement of the decision. Until then the cause might have been reopened, in the discretion of the magistrate, and further evidence or arguments heard. Mandamus to issue.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Gould v. Eastern R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1886
  • Gould v. Eastern R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1886
  • Andrews v. Cassidy
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 28, 1886
    ...142 Mass. 967 N.E. 545ANDREWS and othersv.CASSIDY and another.Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.June 28, This was a petition for mandamus. The petition set forth that the petitioners, copartners, having their usual place of business in Boston, on June 26, 1885, duly recovered......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT