Andrews v. First Nat. Bank
Decision Date | 25 May 1934 |
Citation | 115 Fla. 67,155 So. 143 |
Parties | ANDREWS v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF TAMPA. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Error to Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; L. L. Parks, Judge.
Suit by George Andrews against the First National Bank of Tampa. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
Reversed and remanded.
COUNSEL Holland & Bevis and Gordon Petteway, all of Bartow, for plaintiff in error.
Taliaferro Morris & Carter, of Tampa, for defendant in error.
The plaintiff in error, George Andrews, plaintiff in the court below, brought suit against the defendant in error, the First National Bank of Tampa, and in his declaration alleged that:
A demurrer to this declaration was overruled and the defendant filed several pleas, only the fourth, fifth, and sixth being material here. These pleas read as follows:
'4. That on and prior to May 15, 1929, it was the regular correspondent in Tampa, Florida, of First State Bank of Winter Haven, a State banking corporation now in liquidation hereinafter referred to as the Winter Haven Bank; that said Winter Haven Bank from time to time had balances to its credit with this defendant but that this defendant carried no balances or account on the books of said Winter Haven Bank; that from time to time during said period this defendant received items from said Winter Haven Bank with instructions to collect the same and credit its account with this defendant in the amount of the proceeds; that from time to time in regular course and custom of dealings between said banks, provisional credits were given by this defendant to said Winter Haven Bank prior to the actual collection of said items subject to final payment; that this defendant was not indebted to said Winter Haven Bank on the 15th day of May, 1929, or subsequent thereto in any amount whatsoever; that on the contrary, although credit balances appeared on its books in favor of said Winter Haven Bank on said May 15, 1929, such credit balances were mere provisional credits subject to final payment of items making up said credit; that said balances arose by the granting and extending by this defendant of provisional credit on its books for items sent to it by said Winter Haven Bank for collection and credit, but which had not then been collected; that subsequent to May 15, 1929, items which were so credited subject to final payment were returned to this defendant unpaid and that thereupon this defendant returned to said Winter Haven Bank items returned to it unpaid charging the amount thereof against the credit balances of said Winter Haven Bank; that the said credit balances were used up and exhausted by charging back to said Winter Haven Bank the items so returned to said Winter Haven Bank; that after the Jeffries' check was received from and credited to the account of said Winter Haven Bank by this defendant, endorsed as set forth in the declaration but before May 15, 1929, and before the same could be actually collected, said Winter Haven Bank withdrew from its said account funds in excess of said Jeffries' check; that this defendant either paid the said Winter Haven Bank the face amount of each and every item forwarded to it for collection and credit, or else returned to said Winter Haven Bank each and every item it did not pay, funds so paid being actually withdrawn by said Winter Haven Bank; that this defendant actually paid the Winter Haven Bank the amount of the Jeffries check prior to its collection and was without the use of the money so paid out and was not repaid and reimbursed for the advance so made by it to said Winter Haven Bank until during August of the year 1930, although the Winter Haven Bank had closed its doors on or about May 15th of the preceding year, on which said date it received the amount of the Jeffries check as a preferred claim, and that the said Winter Haven Bank, the plaintiff, and any one for whom said bank was acting have no claim against this defendant, any such claim having been paid and discharged as aforesaid.
'5. That on and prior to May 15, 1929, it was the regular correspondent in Tampa, Florida, of First State Bank of Winter Haven, a State banking corporation now in liquidation hereinafter referred to as the Winter Haven Bank; that said Winter Haven Bank from time to time had balances to its credit with this defendant but that this defendant carried no balances or account on the books of said Winter Haven bank; that from time to time during said period this defendant received items from said Winter Haven bank with instructions to collect the same and credit its account with this defendant in the amount of the proceeds; that from time to time in regular course and custom of dealings between said banks, provisional credits were given by this defendant to said Winter Haven bank prior to the actual collection of said items subject to final payment; that from time to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sorrells Bros. Packing Co. v. Union State Bank
...the proceeds to his account, the bank does not, without more, become a holder in due course of the instrument. Andrews v. First Nat. Bank, 1934, 115 Fla. 67, 155 So. 143; Florida Power & Light Co. v. Newsom, 1933, 111 Fla. 154, 149 So. 621; Johnson v. F. M. Leonard & Co., supra; Bland v. Fi......
-
Investors Syndicate v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.
... ... bank, the amount thereof, though, when credit was first given ... it it could have withdrawn the amount had it desired to do ... so. In this suit the ... similar to those now under consideration and that, in some of ... those cases notably Andrews v. First National Bank of ... Tampa, 115 Fla. 67, 155 So. 143, and Dakin v. Bayly, ... supra it ... ...
-
Hardesty v. Smith
... ... A. Smith, as liquidator ... of the Merchants' Bank & Trust Company. From a decree ... dismissing the bill of complaint, the ... Fla. 467] the amount of the proceeds of the check ... Andrews v. First National Bank of Tampa, 115 Fla ... 67, 155 So. 143 ... ...
-
Kilgore Seed Co. v. Newsom
... ... Newsom, as ... liquidator of the Citizens' Bank & Trust Company ... Judgment for the latter party, and the former brings ... 621, opinion filed June 22, 1933, and George Andrews v ... First National Bank of Tampa (Fla.) 155 So. 143, opinion ... ...