Andrews v. Security Nat. Bank of Wichita Falls, 5712.
Decision Date | 16 May 1932 |
Docket Number | No. 5712.,5712. |
Citation | 50 S.W.2d 253 |
Parties | ANDREWS et ux. v. SECURITY NAT. BANK OF WICHITA FALLS. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Hiram K. Aynesworth and Jos. H. Aynesworth, both of Borger, for plaintiffs in error.
Weeks, Morrow, Francis & Hankerson, of Wichita Falls, for defendant in error.
Statement of the Case.
This suit was filed by the Security National Bank of Wichita Falls against W. R. Andrews and his wife, Bennie Andrews, on five promissory notes, each for the principal sum of $1,287.60, with prayer for judgment on the notes and foreclosure of a deed of trust lien on lots 10, 11, and 12, in block 34, in the city of Electra, in Wichita county. The trial court gave a personal judgment against W. R. Andrews, but denied recovery as against Bennie Andrews, and refused a foreclosure of the lien. Upon appeal by the bank, the judgment of the district court, to the extent that it denied a foreclosure of the lien, was reversed and rendered against both Andrews and wife. 24 S.W.(2d) 509.
The case is before us by writ of error. The defense against the foreclosure of the notes was that the property was the homestead of Andrews and wife. It was undeniably their homestead at the time of the execution of the notes sued on. The notes, however, were in renewal of two notes for $3,000 each, originally executed by Andrews in the form of vendor's lien notes, under circumstances which will be hereafter stated; and the validity of the lien ordered foreclosed by the Court of Civil Appeals depends upon the validity of the lien originally given to secure the two vendor's lien notes just mentioned.
There is no statement of facts in the record. In response to a request of the plaintiff below, the trial court filed conclusions of fact and law.
On and prior to December 23, 1924, Andrews and wife owned and occupied lot 1, block 31, in the town of Electra, as their homestead. This property was fully paid for and was then of the reasonable value of $3,000. At the same time one Reuben R. R. Cook owned all of lots 10, 11, and 12, in block 34, in the town of Electra, on which was located a residence, the whole reasonably worth $8,500. Andrews and Cook, on or about the date named, orally agreed to exchange their respective properties upon the values stated, Andrews to pay the $5,500 difference in cash. However, he did not have the money with which to make this payment, and applied to the defendant in error, the Security National Bank, for a loan of that amount. At the time he was indebted to the defendant in error in the sum of $9,000, evidenced by two notes, for which the bank had no security and which at that time was in no way connected with the subject-matter of this suit. The bank agreed to make the loan, provided Andrews would renew the $9,000 indebtedness by executing three notes, each in the sum of $3,000, to be secured by what the parties termed a vendor's lien on the property which Andrews and wife were to receive in exchange for their home. In the course of time, and in accordance with the tenor of the notes, the notes (twelve in number) given for the $5,500, the difference in value between the properties exchanged, were paid off by Andrews, and the first of the $3,000 notes was duly paid. The notes involved in this suit were given in renewal of the last two of the three $3,000 notes, and the deed of trust in renewal or extension of the so-called vendor's lien, to be hereafter described, which secured them. The agreement between the bank and Andrews personally was that the three notes for $3,000 each were to be executed in favor of Cook, and a vendor's lien was to be reserved in the deed from Cook to Andrews reserving a vendor's lien to secure these notes as well as the first twelve notes, which actually represented a part of the purchase price of the property. All the notes were to be indorsed by Cook to the bank without recourse, and the bank was to pay Cook the $5,500 named above. Cook took no part in the negotiations between Andrews and the bank with reference to the three $3,000 notes, and Mrs. Andrews knew nothing about the execution of these notes and the lien until some years thereafter. The findings of the trial court with reference to this matter are as follows:
On the elaborate conclusions of fact, only part of which we have quoted, and on "the evidence as a whole," the trial court found and filed "Conclusions of law, separate from facts," as follows:
"I conclude from the evidence as a whole and from the facts above found thereon, that the attempted fixing of the lien thereon in the manner and form hereinabove found is and was a fraud upon the rights of the wife and her homestead rights therein, and that the same was simulated and not constituting any part of the consideration for the exchange of the same moving from the said W. R. Andrews to the vendor Reuben R. R. Cook, can not under our laws and the Constitution of this state become a lien upon said lots 10, 11 and 12 in Block 34, Electra, Texas." (Italics ours.)
Opinion.The homestead section of the Constitution involved in this case, article 16, § 50, reads as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carothers' Estate Carothers v. Carothers, Case Number: 31691
...land and 'not a mere privilege of exemption or possession. Evans v. Mills, 67 Fed. 2d 840; Andrews v. Security Natl. Bank, 121 Tex. 409, 50 S.W. 2d 253, 83 A.L.R. 44. The purpose is to provide a home for each citizen where the family may be sheltered and live beyond the reach of financial m......
-
Williams v. Williams
...from a home sanctified The homestead laws are designed to protect the stability and welfare of the state. Andrews v. Security Nat'l Bank, 121 Tex. 409, 50 S.W.2d 253, 256 (1932); Black v. Rockmore, 50 Tex. 88, 96 (1878); 2 G. Thompson, Real Property, § 970 (2d ed. 1939). By protecting citiz......
-
Estate of Johnson v. C.I.R.
...a tender regard for the family, but also contribute to the stability and welfare of the state. Andrews v. Security National Bank of Wichita Falls, 121 Tex. 409, 50 S.W.2d 253, 256 (1932). Texas' was the earliest homestead law, originally enacted in 1839. 1839 Laws of the Republic of Texas, ......
-
Davis, Matter of, 95-11112
...regard for the welfare of the citizen, but have for their object the stability and welfare of the state." Andrews v. Security Nat'l Bank, 121 Tex. 409, 50 S.W.2d 253, 256 (1932). "The homestead exemption was founded on principles of soundest policy.... Its design was not only to protect cit......