Andrews v. State, 95-886
| Decision Date | 17 September 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-886,95-886 |
| Citation | 679 So.2d 859 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D2072 Helen ANDREWS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Richard Parker, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
The appellant challenges her conviction for aggravated battery, a permissive lesser-included offense of attempted first degree murder, the crime with which she was charged. Because the information did not sufficiently allege commission of aggravated battery by causing great bodily harm, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on this theory. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction.
The appellant was tried on an information charging her with attempted first degree murder by stabbing the victim with a knife to effect the appellant's premeditated intent to kill. Over defense objection, the trial court instructed the jury on alternative theories as to the permissive lesser-included offense of aggravated battery. Instructions were given as to aggravated battery by causing great bodily harm, as proscribed by section 784.045(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1993), and aggravated battery by using a deadly weapon, as proscribed by section 784.045(1)(a)2, Florida Statutes (1993). Without referencing the theory upon which its decision was based, the jury found the appellant guilty of aggravated battery.
The information sufficiently asserts facts showing that the appellant committed aggravated battery by using a deadly weapon. But it does not assert, except through inference, facts showing that the appellant committed aggravated battery by causing great bodily harm. Therefore, the information provided no basis for the section 784.045(1)(a)1 instruction. It is error to give an instruction on a permissive lesser-included offense unless the accusatory pleading alleges commission of the lesser offense. State v. Von Deck, 607 So.2d 1388 (Fla.1992); Watkins v. State, 632 So.2d 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). The appellant is therefore entitled to a new trial on the lesser-included offense of aggravated battery. In light of the foregoing, we need not address the cross appeal.
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the case is remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Charles
...that a lesser included offense instruction may not be a vehicle for broadening the State's theory of the case. See Andrews v. State, 679 So.2d 859, 859 (Fla.Dist.App.1996) (defendant convicted of aggravated battery, lesser included offense of charged attempted first-degree murder; informati......
-
State v. Gaither, 93,489.
...According to Gaither, "the original impetus for both crimes stemmed from the same types of actions." Gaither relies on Andrews v. State, 679 So.2d 859 (Fla.Dist.App.1996), and People v. Lopez, 245 Ill.App.3d 41, 185 Ill.Dec. 195, 614 N.E.2d 329 (1993), for the proposition that other courts ......
-
Phillips v. State
...Florida Statutes. Our decisions since Von Deck have consistently adhered to the rulings in that case. See, e.g., Andrews v. State, 679 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Farley v. State, 740 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We note that our decision in Smith v. State, 435 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 19......
-
Levesque v. State, 4D98-3751.
...K.H. v. State, 763 So.2d 1187, 1188 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Lawrence v. State, 685 So.2d 1356, 1357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Andrews v. State, 679 So.2d 859 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Watkins v. State, 632 So.2d 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Accordingly, the trial court erred by improperly instructing the jury......