Andrews v. Wallace

Decision Date29 October 1894
Citation72 Miss. 291,16 So. 204
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
PartiesF. M. ANDREWS v. MARTHA J. WALLACE

October 1894

FROM the circuit court of Sunflower county. HON. R. W. WILLIAMSON Judge.

The case is stated in the opinion.

Judgment reversed.

Dabney & Mc Cabe, for appellant.

This case is supposed to have originated before a justice of the peace, but there is nothing in the record to show that fact. The circuit court was without jurisdiction, and erred in proceeding to trial and judgment.

Southworth Stevens & Neill and J. T. Manion, for appellee.

OPINION

WHITFIELD, J.

The fifteen assignments of error are without merit, save the first. That seeks a reversal, on the ground that the circuit court had no jurisdiction of the case, which was an appeal, as we suppose, from a court of a justice of the peace. There is no judgment of the justice of the peace in this record--no copy of the record and proceedings before him; no paper of any kind showing that the case was ever before a justice of the peace except one, and that paper is the declaration in the case, which, sworn to before the justice of the peace, was afterwards filed in the circuit court. We cannot know from this record that the suit which was brought in trover for two hundred dollars was not brought originally in the circuit court. In Crapoo v. Grand Gulf, 17 Miss. 205, 9 S. & M. 205, an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, there was nothing in the transcript of the record in this court to indicate that the case was appealed from the justice's court, except the appeal bond, and the court said: "As the circuit court acquires jurisdiction in such cases only by appeal, the record must show the foundation of a judgment. In such cases, it only acts as an appellate court, and this record does not show that it did so act." This case falls strictly within the principle of that case.

There has been no application here by appellee for a writ of certiorari to bring up a more perfect record. It may be that the transcript from the court of the justice of the peace was before the circuit court. We can look only to the record here. We are strongly impressed with the justice of appellee's cause, and, whilst thus compelled to reverse the judgment, we will dismiss all the proceedings in the circuit court, and leave in full force the judgment, if any there be, in the magistrate's court.

The judgment is reversed, and judgment...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 7 d1 Outubro d1 1929
    ...record before the court. Ex parte Golding, 114 So. 385; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 640; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184; Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291; Crapoo Grand Gulf, 9 S. & M. 205; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 643, 29 So. 470; City of Pass Christian v. Lizana, 106 Miss. 470; Ke......
  • Lott v. Watkins
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 7 d1 Dezembro d1 1931
    ...cause, and therefore the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction on appeal. Among the cases so deciding are the following: Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So. 204; Gardner v. R. Co., 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. Xydias v. Pellman, 121 Miss. 400, 83 So. 620; Burrow v. State, 143 Miss. 221, 108 So......
  • Tallahatchie Lumber Co. v. Thatch
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 18 d1 Março d1 1918
    ... ... still it could, in this court, challenge the jurisdiction of ... the court below as to the amount in controversy. Andrews ... v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So. 204 ... The ... question of jurisdiction can be raised by a stranger to the ... record at any ... ...
  • Gardner v. New Orleans & N.E.R. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 4 d1 Fevereiro d1 1901
    ... ... been complied with. We have had two such records before us ... within two weeks. This court has twice settled the point. See ... Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So ... 204; Crapoo v. Grand Gulf, 9 S. & M. 205 ... Not ... having jurisdiction, on the record as it now ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT