Andrews v. Wallace
Decision Date | 29 October 1894 |
Citation | 72 Miss. 291,16 So. 204 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | F. M. ANDREWS v. MARTHA J. WALLACE |
October 1894
FROM the circuit court of Sunflower county. HON. R. W. WILLIAMSON Judge.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Judgment reversed.
Dabney & Mc Cabe, for appellant.
This case is supposed to have originated before a justice of the peace, but there is nothing in the record to show that fact. The circuit court was without jurisdiction, and erred in proceeding to trial and judgment.
Southworth Stevens & Neill and J. T. Manion, for appellee.
The fifteen assignments of error are without merit, save the first. That seeks a reversal, on the ground that the circuit court had no jurisdiction of the case, which was an appeal, as we suppose, from a court of a justice of the peace. There is no judgment of the justice of the peace in this record--no copy of the record and proceedings before him; no paper of any kind showing that the case was ever before a justice of the peace except one, and that paper is the declaration in the case, which, sworn to before the justice of the peace, was afterwards filed in the circuit court. We cannot know from this record that the suit which was brought in trover for two hundred dollars was not brought originally in the circuit court. In Crapoo v. Grand Gulf, 17 Miss. 205, 9 S. & M. 205, an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, there was nothing in the transcript of the record in this court to indicate that the case was appealed from the justice's court, except the appeal bond, and the court said: This case falls strictly within the principle of that case.
There has been no application here by appellee for a writ of certiorari to bring up a more perfect record. It may be that the transcript from the court of the justice of the peace was before the circuit court. We can look only to the record here. We are strongly impressed with the justice of appellee's cause, and, whilst thus compelled to reverse the judgment, we will dismiss all the proceedings in the circuit court, and leave in full force the judgment, if any there be, in the magistrate's court.
The judgment is reversed, and judgment...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jones v. State
...record before the court. Ex parte Golding, 114 So. 385; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 640; Ruff v. Montgomery, 83 Miss. 184; Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291; Crapoo Grand Gulf, 9 S. & M. 205; Gardner v. Railroad, 78 Miss. 643, 29 So. 470; City of Pass Christian v. Lizana, 106 Miss. 470; Ke......
-
Lott v. Watkins
...cause, and therefore the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction on appeal. Among the cases so deciding are the following: Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So. 204; Gardner v. R. Co., 78 Miss. 640, 29 So. Xydias v. Pellman, 121 Miss. 400, 83 So. 620; Burrow v. State, 143 Miss. 221, 108 So......
-
Tallahatchie Lumber Co. v. Thatch
... ... still it could, in this court, challenge the jurisdiction of ... the court below as to the amount in controversy. Andrews ... v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So. 204 ... The ... question of jurisdiction can be raised by a stranger to the ... record at any ... ...
-
Gardner v. New Orleans & N.E.R. Co.
... ... been complied with. We have had two such records before us ... within two weeks. This court has twice settled the point. See ... Andrews v. Wallace, 72 Miss. 291, 16 So ... 204; Crapoo v. Grand Gulf, 9 S. & M. 205 ... Not ... having jurisdiction, on the record as it now ... ...