Ankeny v. Palmer
| Decision Date | 01 January 1873 |
| Parties | WILLIAM P. ANKENY and others v. L. R. PALMER and another. |
| Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
A. N. Merrick, for appellants.
Beebe & Shaw, for respondents.
The questions presented in this case are substantially the same as those involved and determined in the case of Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Palmer, ante, 424, and need not be further considered.
The order overruling the demurrer is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
- Fieldhouse v. Leisburg
- Stone v. Tex. Co
-
In re Widening Twenty-Eighth Street in Minneapolis From Thirtieth Avenue South to Dorman Street
...together with the proper items incidental thereto. Dun. Dig. § 6861; Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Palmer, 20 Minn. 424 (468); Ankeny v. Palmer, 20 Minn. 431 (477); County Lyon v. Lien, 105 Minn. 55, 116 N.W. 1017; Town of Rost v. O'Connor, 145 Minn. 81, 176 N.W. 166, 9 A.L.R. 1265; Ashevill......