Ankers v. District School Bd. of Pasco County, 81-280
| Decision Date | 18 November 1981 |
| Docket Number | No. 81-280,81-280 |
| Citation | 406 So.2d 72 |
| Parties | 1 Ed. Law Rep. 743 Thomas ANKERS, Jr., a minor, by and through his father and mother, Thomas Ankers and Ann Ankers, and Thomas Ankers and Ann Ankers, individually and jointly, Appellants, v. DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Horace A. Knowlton, III, Chris W. Altenbernd and Barbara J. Paulson of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, Tampa, for appellants.
Joe A. McClain of McClain & Hobby, Dade City, for appellee.
This appeal presents one issue: whether appellants' complaint stated a cause of action for negligence against the appellee school board.
Appellant Thomas Ankers, Jr., and his parents sued the District School Board of Pasco County. Their complaint alleged that Thomas, a student at Land-O-Lakes High School, sustained serious injury to the fingers of his left hand while working with a bench saw in the shop room during his lunch period. These injuries, appellants alleged, resulted from the school board's negligent maintenance and supervision of the saw and the area surrounding it. Alternatively, the complaint asserted that the appellee school board was negligent in failing to have a teacher present in the area or in failing to prevent students from entering the shop room when instructional personnel were absent, and in failing to instruct students in the use of the saw and related safety equipment.
Appellee moved to dismiss the complaint on ground that it failed to allege facts establishing the relationship between the parties from which the school board's duty to avoid negligence had arisen. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice. This appeal ensued.
To sustain a cause of action in negligence, a complaint must allege ultimate facts which establish a relationship between the parties giving rise to a legal duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains. It must also show that the defendant negligently breached that duty, and that the plaintiff's injury was proximately caused by the defendant's negligence. Lake Parker Mall, Inc. v. Carson, 327 So.2d 121 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); 23 Fla.Jur. Negligence § 101 (1979). The allegation that the minor plaintiff was in attendance at the school when the accident occurred was sufficient to demonstrate the relationship between the school board and Thomas giving rise to a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rupp v. Bryant
...recognized that a negligent failure to act in carrying out this duty of the school is actionable. See Ankers v. District School Board, 406 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Padgett v. School Board, 395 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The genesis of this supervisory duty is based on the school emp......
-
Roberts v. Robertson County Bd. of Educ.
...school districts are not expected to be insurers of the safety of students while they are at school. Ankers v. District School Board of Pasco County, 406 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla.App.1981). Nor are teachers expected in every instance to supervise all the activities of all students at all times. Sh......
-
Collins v. School Bd. of Broward County
...of that duty; and (3) the proximate causation of the student's injury by the teacher's negligence. Ankers v. District School Board of Pasco County, 406 So.2d 72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Without question, the school was obligated to supervise Hammack and his classmates. Although a school board is......
-
Rishel v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
...duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains." Ankers v. District School Board of Pasco County, 406 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). It follows that if no legal duty exists, there can be no cause of action for negligence. See Price at Appe......