Anonymous Member of the Bar, Matter of

Decision Date18 January 1991
Citation303 S.C. 306,400 S.E.2d 483
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesIn the Matter of an ANONYMOUS MEMBER OF THE BAR, Respondent.
ORDER

This attorney grievance matter arises out of respondent's representation of a criminal defendant. The issue is the duty of an attorney, retained for purposes of trial only, to assist his client in perfecting an appeal. We hold the attorney must serve and file the Notice of Appeal to protect the client's right to appeal.

After the client is convicted and sentenced, trial counsel in all cases has a duty to make certain that the client is fully aware of the right to appeal. White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35 (1974); Comment to Rule 1.3, Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 Counsel should give the client his professional judgment whether an appeal should be taken and ascertain whether the client wishes to appeal.

If the client wishes to appeal and is indigent or claims at the end of trial to be indigent, trial counsel (whether appointed or retained) must serve and file a Notice of Appeal as required by Rule 203, SCACR, and request a determination of indigency by the Office of Appellate Defense. If determined to be indigent, trial counsel is automatically relieved as counsel unless otherwise requested by the Office of Appellate Defense. Rule 602(E)(4), SCACR. If determined not to be indigent, counsel must continue to represent the client until relieved by the Court under Rule 235, SCACR. Id.

If the client is clearly not indigent, the obligations of retained counsel whose client wishes to appeal are less clear. Because he has been retained solely for the purpose of trial, counsel is effectively withdrawing when the trial ends. Therefore, under Rule 1.16 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, counsel is required to take all necessary steps as may be reasonably practicable to protect the client's interests.

The requirement to take reasonable steps to protect the client requires counsel retained only for the trial to serve and file the Notice of Appeal and to continue to represent the client until relieved by this Court under Rule 235, SCACR. 2 The attorney may be relieved if he shows that he was not hired to represent the non-indigent client on appeal. 3

The Executive Committee recommended respondent receive a private reprimand for failing to perfect an appeal on behalf of his non-indigent client. We decline to impose such a sanction here in light of the novel issue raised. Accordingly, the complaint against respondent is

DISMISSED.

1 The Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) are contained in Rule 407, SCACR. Although this matter arose prior to the effective date of the SCACR, we have cited to the new appellate court rules because it will be more beneficial to the practitioner. The same or similar provisions existed under the Supreme Court Rules. Compare Comment to Rule 1.3, RPC with EC 2-31, Supreme Court Rule 32; Rule 1.16, RPC, with DR 2-110(A)(2), Supreme Court Rule 32; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Frazer v. South Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • December 8, 2005
    ...Flores-Ortega. 14. We note that it appears this would also be insufficient as a matter of South Carolina law. In re Anonymous Member of the Bar, 303 S.C. 306, 400 S.E.2d 483 (1991); White v. State, 263 S.C. 110, 208 S.E.2d 35, 39 (1974) (noting that even though there is "a reasonable basis ......
  • State v. Devore
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 23, 2016
    ...and to continue to represent the client until relieved by [the appellate court] under Rule 235, SCACR." In re Anonymous Member of the Bar, 303 S.C. 306, 308, 400 S.E.2d 483, 484 (1991). Rule 264 of our appellate court rules, formerly Rule 235, provides for continued representation by a part......
  • Sutton v. State
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 13, 2004
    ...client in filing an appeal." Wilson v. State, 348 S.C. 215, 218 n. 3, 559 S.E.2d 581, 583 n. 3 (2002) (citing In re Anonymous Member of the Bar, 303 S.C. 306, 400 S.E.2d 483 (1991) and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967)); see also Rule 602(e), SCACR ("T......
  • Hayes v. Warden
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • May 28, 2015
    ...as required by Rule 203, SCACR, and request a determination of indigency by the Office of Appellate Defense. In re Matter of Anonymous Member of the Bar, 400 S.E.2d 483 (S.C. 1991). 4. Petitioner submits a copy of the order from the South Carolina Court of Appeals stating that "Appellant ha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT