Ansari v. MB Hamptons, LLC
Decision Date | 30 March 2016 |
Citation | 28 N.Y.S.3d 397,137 A.D.3d 1174 |
Parties | Anees ANSARI, etc., respondent-appellant, v. MB HAMPTONS, LLC, appellant-respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
137 A.D.3d 1174
28 N.Y.S.3d 397
Anees ANSARI, etc., respondent-appellant,
v.
MB HAMPTONS, LLC, appellant-respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
March 30, 2016.
Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis & Fishlinger, Uniondale, N.Y. (Gregory A. Cascino and Michael Reagan of counsel), for appellant-respondent.
Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, Newburgh, N.Y. (Finkelstein & Partners [Marie M. DuSault ], of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SANDRA L. SGROI, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Strauss, J.), entered November 15, 2012, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of the same order as denied his cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 and 3124 to strike the defendant's answer based on its failure to comply with court-ordered discovery, or, in the alternative, to compel a response to his discovery demands.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff allegedly sustained personal injuries when he slipped and fell on a wet floor in a commercial building owned by the defendant. He commenced this action against the defendant seeking damages. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The plaintiff cross-moved to strike the defendant's answer for failure to respond to his outstanding discovery demands or, in the alternative, to compel a response. The Supreme Court denied the motion and the cross motion. The defendant appeals and the plaintiff cross-appeals.
"A defendant who moves for summary judgment in a slip-and-fall case has the initial burden of making a prima facie showing that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kinzelberg v. St. Catherine of Siena Med. Ctr.
...lack of constructive notice without specificity as to cleaning or inspection of the subject area (See Ansari v MB Hamptons, LLC, 137 A.D.3d 1174, 28 N.Y.S.3d 397 [2d Dept 2016]; Garcia-Monsatve v Wellington Leasing, L.P., 123 A.D.3d 1085, 1 N.Y.S.3d 228 [2d Dept 2014]; Rodriguez v Shoprite ......
-
Ryan-Fichetti v. Cnty. of Suffolk
...lack of constructive notice without specificity as to cleaning or inspection of the subject area (see Ansari v MB Hampton,, LLC, 137 A.D.3d 1174,28 N.Y.S.3d 397 [2d Dept 2016]; Garcia-Monsalve v Wellington Leasing, L.P., 123 A.D.3d 1085, 1 N.Y.S.3d 228 [2d Dept 2014]; Rodriguez v Shoprite S......
-
Feliz v. Jims Realty Eec.
... ... cleaned or inspected relative to when the Plaintiffs injury ... occurred. See Ansari v. MB Hamptons, ... LLC, 137 A.D.3d 1174, 28 N.Y.S.3d 397 [2nd ... Dept, 2016]; Williams v. New York City ... Hous. Auth., 119 A.D.3d 857, 990 ... ...
-
Burrus v. Douglaston Realty Mgmt. Corp.
...the alleged condition (see Lipani v. Hiawatha Elementary Sch. , 153 A.D.3d 1247, 1249–1250, 61 N.Y.S.3d 582 ; Ansari v. MB Hamptons, LLC , 137 A.D.3d 1174, 1175, 28 N.Y.S.3d 397 ). Furthermore, we agree with the Supreme Court's conclusion that the defendants failed to present evidence regar......