Anteri v. NRS Const. Corp.

Decision Date18 February 1986
Citation117 A.D.2d 696,498 N.Y.S.2d 435
PartiesVito ANTERI, Plaintiff, v. NRS CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff, et al., Defendants; M & C Lazzinnaro Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, Castro-Blanco, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents (and a Fifth-Party action).
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Page 435

498 N.Y.S.2d 435
117 A.D.2d 696
Vito ANTERI, Plaintiff,
v.
NRS CONSTRUCTION CORP., Defendant Third-Party Plaintiff, et
al., Defendants;
M & C Lazzinnaro Construction Corp., Third-Party Defendant
and Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
Castro-Blanco, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents
(and a Fifth-Party action).
Supreme Court, Appellate Division,
Second Department.
Feb. 18, 1986.

Page 436

John J. Wrenn, New York City, (Joanne Redden, of counsel), for third-party defendant and fourth-party plaintiff-appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, New York City (Douglas L. Pintauro, of counsel), for fourth-party defendant-respondent Castro-Blanco, Piscioneri & Feder.

Morris, Graham, Stephens & McMorrow, Westbury (Mario A. Fristachi, of counsel), for fourth-party defendant-respondent Ewell W. Finley, P.C.

Before MOLLEN, P.J., and MANGANO, LAWRENCE and KOOPER, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, M & C Lazzinnaro Construction Corp. appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated June 26, 1984, as dismissed its fourth party complaint pursuant to CPLR 3124 and 3126.

Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The instant actions arise out of an incident which occurred on April 3, 1979, when the plaintiff, an employee of M & C Lazzinnaro Construction Corp. (M & C), a subcontractor, fell through the floor of a building which was undergoing renovations. The plaintiff subsequently commenced an action against the general contractor of the construction site, as well as the owner of the premises, seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the 1979 accident. Thereafter, the general contractor instituted a third-party action for indemnification and contribution against M & C. M & C, in turn, commenced a fourth-party action for indemnification and contribution against the renovated building's architect, Castro-Blanco, Piscioneri & Feder (Castro-Blanco) and the structural engineer, Ewell W. Finley, P.C. (Finley).

In September 1981 Special Term scheduled the deposition of all the parties in the aforesaid actions. At its court-ordered deposition, M & C initially produced an employee who was not present on the day of plaintiff's accident and who was not knowledgeable as to the circumstances of the accident. In response thereto, the fourth-party defendants Castro-Blanco and Finley obtained an order dated June 29, 1982...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Mendoza v. Exclusive Concepts, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 32568(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 9/8/2008)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 8 Septiembre 2008
    ... ... Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N.Y.2d 395; Gervasio v. Di Napoli, 134 A.D.2d 235, 236; Assing v. United Rubber Supply Co., 126 ... Ducille, 170 A.D.2d 657, 567 N.Y.S.2d 79; Brandi v. Chan, 151 A.D.2d 853, 542 N.Y.S.2d 827; Anteri v. NRS Constr. Corp., 117 A.D.2d 696, 498 N.Y.S.2d 435) ...         Brady v. County of ... ...
  • DiDomenico v. C & S Aeromatik Supplies, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 28 Diciembre 1998
    ... ... of CPLR 3126 are not foreclosed by the decision of the Court of Appeals in Oak Beach Inn Corp. v. Babylon Beacon, 62 N.Y.2d 158, 476 N.Y.S.2d 269, 464 N.E.2d 967, cert. denied 469 U.S. 1158, ... inference" may be drawn that the destruction was deliberate (i.e., "wilful") (see, e.g., Anteri v. NRS Constr. Corp., 117 A.D.2d 696, 498 N.Y.S.2d 435; Ricco v. Deepdale Garden Apts. Corp., ... ...
  • Walk & Smile, Inc. v. 2491 Atlantic Ave. Corp., 1
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Mayo 1989
    ... ... the drastic remedy of dismissal is best suited to cases where there has been a willful or protracted delay or other contumacious conduct (see, Anteri v. NRS Construction Corp., 148 A.D.2d 563, 539 N.Y.S.2d 33; Sawh v. Bridges, 120 A.D.2d 74, 78, 507 N.Y.S.2d 632; Stephens v. Stephens, 146 A.D.2d ... ...
  • Sawh v. Bridges
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 27 Octubre 1986
    ... ... , the harsh sanction of dismissal of a complaint will generally not be warranted (see, e.g., Anteri v. NRS Constr. Corp., 117 A.D.2d 696, 498 N.Y.S.2d 435; Baumann v. Dee, 100 A.D.2d 504, 472 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT