Anth v. Wells
Decision Date | 22 June 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 19409.,19409. |
Citation | 285 S.W. 768 |
Parties | ANTH v. WELLS. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Louis County; John W. McElhinney, Judge.
"Not to be officially published."
Action by Edna Bender Anth against Rolla Wells, receiver of `United Railways Company of St. Louis. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Charles W. Bates, T. E. Francis, and John F. Evans, all of St. Louis (A. E. L. Gardner, of Clayton, of counsel), for appellant.
Jos. A. Falzone and George F. Heege, both of Clayton, for respondent.
This is an action for personal injuries received by plaintiff in a collision between an automobile in which she was riding and the defendant's street car, which occurred at the intersection of Monroe and Clay avenues, in the city of Kirkwood.
The trial, with a jury, resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,500, and judgment was given accordingly. Defendant appeals.
Defendant maintains double tracks on Clay avenue, which runs north and south and intersects Monroe avenue at right angles. South-bound cars are operated on the west track and north-bound cars on the east track. The automobile in which plaintiff was riding at the time of the collision was going east on Monroe avenue. William G. Anth was the owner of the automobile, and was driving it at the time. Plaintiff was riding in the automobile as the guest of the driver. It is conceded that her relation to the driver was not such as to impute to her his negligence. The street car which collided with the automobile was going north on the east track, and struck the automobile about midway between the front and rear, and carried it north along the track a distance of 100 to 132 feet before the car was stopped. The accident occurred on the 17th day of December, 1923, in the forenoon. It was a dry day. The automobile was a roadster, weighing about 2,800 pounds. It was wrecked by the collision, and the plaintiff was seriously injured.
Plaintiff testified:
William G. Anth, produced by plaintiff, testified:
A number of other witnesses were produced by Plaintiff. They testified that the automobile in which plaintiff was riding stopped at the west curb of Clay...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gately v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
... ... submitted to the jury must be judged as of the close of the ... case. Burton v. Holman, 231 S.W. 630; Simpson v ... Wells, 237 S.W. 520; Canty v. Halpin, 242 S.W ... 94; Melican v. Whitlow Const. Co., 278 S.W. 361; ... Larkin v. Wells, 278 S.W. 1087; Seewald ... 841; Riley v. Independence, 258 Mo. 671; Morris ... v. Union Depot, 320 Mo. 371; Murphy v ... Duerbeck, 19 S.W.2d 1040; Anth v. Wells, 285 ... S.W. 768. (d) But even if the instruction might have been ... more specifically worked as to the manner or way in which ... ...
-
State ex rel. State Highway Com'n v. Bailey
... ... errors must be shown to have been prejudicial. State ex ... rel. Mut. Assn. v. Allen, 336 Mo. 352, 78 S.W.2d 862; ... Anth v. Wells, 285 S.W. 768; Clark v ... Skinner, 334 Mo. 1190, 70 S.W.2d 1094; Carpenter v ... Burmeister, 217 Mo.App. 104, 273 S.W. 418; State ... ...
-
Gately v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
...etc., 238 S.W. 841; Riley v. Independence, 258 Mo. 671; Morris v. Union Depot, 320 Mo. 371; Murphy v. Duerbeck, 19 S.W. (2d) 1040; Anth v. Wells, 285 S.W. 768. (d) But even if the instruction might have been more specifically worded as to the manner or way in which defendant's blacksmith wo......
-
State ex rel. Hwy. Comm. v. Bailey et al., 24774.
...the errors must be shown to have been prejudicial. State ex rel. Mut. Assn. v. Allen, 336 Mo. 352, 78 S.W. (2d) 862; Anth v. Wells, 285 S.W. 768; Clark v. Skinner, 334 Mo. 1190, 70 S.W. (2d) 1094; Carpenter v. Burmeister, 217 Mo. App. 104, 273 S.W. 418; State ex rel. St. L.P.S. Co. v. Haid,......