Anthony v. Anthony
| Decision Date | 03 January 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D06-473.,3D06-473. |
| Citation | 949 So.2d 226 |
| Parties | Andrew John ANTHONY, Appellant, v. Raquel ANTHONY, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Before COPE, C.J., and GREEN, J. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Former husband Andrew John Anthony appeals an order enforcing a settlement agreement requiring him to sign the former wife's proposed release. We reverse.
The parties were divorced in 2005. The final dissolution judgment incorporated a memorandum of settlement between the parties. Paragraph 20 of the memorandum stated:
The Husband shall execute full and complete releases to the Wife and Javier Perez-Abreu [her attorney] through the date of the Final Judgment; the Wife shall execute a full and complete release to the Husband through the date of the Final Judgment; Javier Perez-Abreu, Esq., shall execute a full and complete release to the Husband through the date of the Final Judgment.
The parties subsequently were unable to agree on the language of the releases required under this paragraph. The former husband filed a motion to enforce final judgment. His main contention was that the release contemplated by paragraph 20 included only the former wife and her attorney, Perez-Abreu, but not her attorney's law firm. He further argued that the firm was never mentioned when the releases and settlement were being negotiated between the parties. Each party then submitted their own proposed versions of the releases. The former husband prepared a general release between himself and the former wife, and one between himself and her lawyer individually. The former wife prepared a release that included her attorney's law firm. After hearing evidence from both sides, the court ordered the former husband to sign the wife's proposed releases. The former husband now appeals.
We cannot endorse the trial court's interpretation of paragraph 20 in the agreement based upon the plain language utilized therein. The unambiguous terms in a contract should be given their plain meaning. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Metro. Dade County, 639 So.2d 63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). "When a contract is clear and unambiguous, "the actual language used in the contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties, and the plain meaning of that language controls."" Maher v. Schumacher, 605 So.2d 481, 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). In this case, paragraph 20 clearly and unambiguously states that the "former husband shall execute full and complete releases to the Wife and Javier Perez-Abreu," her attorney. There is no ambiguity here allowing for an interpretation that permits a release of the law firm as well. Hence, it was error to order the former husband to sign a release that was wider in scope than that agreed to and specified by the parties. On remand, the parties shall execute the former husband's proposed agreement, which does not include the law firm.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pardes v. Pardes
...the contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties, and the plain meaning of that language controls.’ " Anthony v. Anthony, 949 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting Maher v. Schumacher, 605 So. 2d 481, 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) ). See also City of Florida City v. Public Risk......
-
Pardes v. Pardes
... ... the parties, and the plain meaning of that language ... controls.'" Anthony v. Anthony , 949 So.2d ... 226, 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (quoting Maher v ... Schumacher , 605 So.2d 481, 482 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)) ... ...
-
Ferk Family, LP v. Frank
...422 (Fla. 1986) ; Idearc Media Corp. v. M.R. Friedman and G.A. Friedman, P.A., 985 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) ; Anthony v. Anthony, 949 So.2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) ; BAC Intern. Credit Corp. v. Macia, 626 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). We conclude that Melendez was not required to compl......
-
Whitwam v. Jetcard Plus, Inc., Case No. 14-CIV-22320-BLOOM/Valle
...Cnty., Fla., 2010 WL 1223776, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 29, 2010) aff'd, 445 F. App'x 165 (11th Cir. 2011) (citing Anthony v. Anthony, 949 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)). "A contract is ambiguous where it is 'susceptible to two different interpretations, each one of which is reasonably inf......
-
Alternative dispute resolution and settlement
...rewrite terms of settlement agreements to add detail and impose burdens not provided in the original agreement); Anthony v. Anthony , 949 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)(trial court erred in interpreting parties’ settlement agreement where there was no ambiguity in the agreement. The actual l......