Anthony v. Barss

Citation193 N.E.2d 329,346 Mass. 401
PartiesFrank ANTHONY v. William BARSS. Frank ANTHONY v. Connie BARSS.
Decision Date01 November 1963
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

John G. Kottis, Uxbridge, for plaintiff.

Richard S. McCabe, Maynard, for defendants.

Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, KIRK, SPIEGEL, and REARDON, JJ.

WILKINS, Chief Justice.

In these two actions of tort for libel the declarations are identical. In each a demurrer was sustained on the ground that no legal cause of action was stated. The plaintiff appealed.

We summarize the allegations of the declarations. The plaintiff was the owner, editor, and publisher of a newspaper with news and editorial coverage, containing regular advertising from business establishments, called 'Frontier,' and circulated in Worcester and Middlesex counties. The defendant 'falsely and maliciously wrote and published of the plaintiff and his publication' a letter, which was sent to all the advertisers, which read:

'June 20, 1962

'Sir: We have noticed your ad in Mr. Frank Anthony's circular Frontier. Perhaps, in the pressure of business, you have not had time to examine the editorial content of Frontier, or to question whether the editor's motive is to enlighten or merely to irritate his readers. Nothing is more irritating than a presentation of the news (item or editorial) compiled without proper regard for facts. Do you believe that irritating advertising is the best way to keep customers and contact new ones? We believe that Mr. Anthony's readers are perceptive enough to discern his lack of objectivity. A lasting relationship between an advertiser and his customer is based on truth, not distortion. We suggest that you seriously consider whether you wish your name to be associated with a publication of this type.' The charges and statements were false and, by reason of their publication, the plaintiff's reputation in his profession and his reputation and standing in the community 'as a publisher, as a businessman, and as a man' were damaged.

In this action for libel the difficulty, as usual, lies in the application to facts of well settled law. See Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co., 332 Mass. 304, 305-306, 125 N.E.2d 137, 51 A.L.R.2d 547. A demurrer cannot be sustained unless the words are incapable of any defamatory meaning. Ingalls v. Hastings & Sons Publishing Co., 304 Mass. 31, 34, 22 N.E.2d 657. The test is whether, in the circumstances, the writing...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Arsenault v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts
    • 17 Marzo 1980
    ...55-56, 217 N.E.2d 736 (1966); Mabardi v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp., 347 Mass. 411, 413, 198 N.E.2d 304 (1964); Anthony v. Barss, 346 Mass. 401, 402, 193 N.E.2d 329 (1963); Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co., 332 Mass. 304, 305-06, 125 N.E.2d 137 (1955). The test is "whether, in the circumst......
  • Smith v. Suburban Restaurants, Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 3 Marzo 1978
    ...class of the community." Muchnick v. Post Publishing Co., 332 Mass. 304, 305-306, 125 N.E.2d 137, 138 (1955). See Anthony v. Barss, 346 Mass. 401, 402, 193 N.E.2d 329 (1963). Here, the question is whether the words in the letter would tend to injure the plaintiff's reputation in the communi......
  • Twohig v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 10 Enero 1964
    ...words are not libellous and that the innuendoes are not warranted. 2 The well settled law was concisely restated recently in Anthony v. Barss, Mass., 193 N.E.2d 329, citing cases. a 'A demurrer cannot be sustained unless the words are incapable of any defamatory meaning. * * * The test is w......
  • Mabardi v. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp., HERALD-TRAVELER
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • 1 Mayo 1964
    ...and fraudulent acts being investigated * * *.' We have the problem of applying well settled law to the facts alleged. See Anthony v. Barss, Mass., 193 N.E.2d 329. 1 'It is settled that a demurrer to a declaration in libel cannot be sustained unless the words are not reasonably capable of an......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT