Appalachian Insurance Company v. General Electric Company, 3883.
Decision Date | 15 June 2004 |
Docket Number | 3883. |
Citation | 8 A.D.3d 109,2004 NY Slip Op 05150,778 N.Y.S.2d 494 |
Parties | APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Respondent, and ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.) |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
A court may, in the exercise of its discretion, vacate its own order "for sufficient reason and in the interests of substantial justice" (Woodson v Mendon Leasing Corp., 100 NY2d 62, 68 [2003]). GE plausibly argues that if it had been aware the issue of coverage for losses incurred pursuant to administrative agency orders was being considered by a California appellate court, it would never have included the California sites in the list of those voluntarily dismissed. While GE's counsel probably should have been aware of the pending California case when the dismissal order was entered, she did promptly notify the IAS court after learning of that ruling, and requested reinstatement of the claims at issue. Appellants have not indicated how they were prejudiced by reinstatement of these claims, which amounted to only 3 of the 509 sites included in the voluntary dismissal exhibit. It does not appear that any discovery or deposition schedule was disrupted during the period between initial dismissal of the claims and their actual reinstatement.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Arnav Indus., Inc. v., Index No. 13965/1990
...Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68 (2003); Goldman v. Cotter, 10 A.D.3d 289, 293 (1st Dep't 2004); Appalachian Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 8 A.D.3d 109, 109 (1st Dep't 2004); Bay Crest Assn., Inc. v. Paar, 99 A.D.3d 744, 746 (2d Dep't 2012), A new action for fraud would be required to vacate a sat......
-
Henderson-Jones v. City of N.Y.
...N.E.2d 1156 (2003) ; Goldman v. Cotter, 10 A.D.3d 289, 293, 781 N.Y.S.2d 28 (1st Dep't 2004) ; Appalachian Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 8 A.D.3d 109, 109, 778 N.Y.S.2d 494 (1st Dep't 2004). Plaintiffs, however, seek damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for defendants' violations of feder......
-
Henderson-Jones v. City of N.Y., Index No. 115360/2006
...Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68 (2003); Goldman v. Cotter, 10 A.D.3d 289, 293 (1st Dep't 2004); Appalachian Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 8 A.D.3d 109, 109 (1st Dep't 2004). Plaintiffs, however, seek damages pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for defendants' violations of federal law. Defendant City m......
-
Andersen v. Young & Rubicam, Inc.
...Corp., 100 N.Y.2d 62, 68 (2003); Goldman v. Cotter, 10 N.Y.3d 289, 293 (1st Dep't 2004); Appalachian Ins. Co. v. General Elec. Co., 8 A.D. 3d 109 (1st Dep't 2004); Bay Crest Assn., Inc. v. Paar, 99 A.D. 3d 744, 746 (2d Dep't 2012), plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a sufficient reason for......