Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, Inc.
| Decision Date | 24 January 1983 |
| Citation | 458 N.Y.S.2d 619,91 A.D.2d 1029 |
| Parties | Cherie APPEL, Respondent, v. CHARLES HEINSOHN, INC., d/b/a Lakeside Riding Academy, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
McCoy & Agoglia, P.C., Mineola (Patrick J. Crowe, Mineola, of counsel), for appellant.
Bauman, Greene, Sims & Kunkis, New York City (Edgar T. Schleider, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before TITONE, J.P., and GIBBONS, THOMPSON and BRACKEN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 1, 1982, which denied its motion for summary judgment.
Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, motion granted, and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed.
Plaintiff was injured on May 13, 1978, when she fell off a horse on the bridle path of Hempstead State Park. Plaintiff, a 32-year-old woman, arrived with a friend at defendant's riding academy on the morning of the incident. Both plaintiff and her friend indicated that they were experienced riders. Plaintiff requested a horse that would respond to "light hands", meaning one that would respond to commands that are given gently and easily. Pursuant to the rules of the riding academy, plaintiff and her friend first rode their horses in its corral area, were observed by its manager, and then put the horses through walk, trot and canter paces. Plaintiff appeared to have no difficulty controlling her horse and it was responsive to her commands. When the manager was satisfied that plaintiff and her friend were qualified riders they were allowed to leave the riding academy property to ride on the trails of Hempstead State Park. In order to get to the park it was necessary to travel a short distance on a public road. According to plaintiff's examination before trial, once they reached the public road her horse began to act nervously, shifting from one foreleg to the other. She managed to calm the horse down. Once they reached the bridle path, plaintiff loosened the reins and the horse began trotting. A few moments later, she loosened the reins further to direct her horse to canter. At about this time plaintiff and her friend encountered another rider who ran his horse back and forth past them several times. When plaintiff asked him to stop, he made some rude remark. Several minutes after this incident, and about 20 minutes after they had started riding, plaintiff's horse broke into a spontaneous gallop. She reined in on the horse but was unable to stop it and eventually she fell off sustaining injuries.
To sustain her cause of action plaintiff relies on the theory that the horse was unsuitable for the purpose for which it was hired. She incorrectly claims that the vicious propensity of the horse is not a necessary element of her proof. The term ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Forrest v. Gilley
...(1991), A.D.2d 564 N.Y.S.2d 151 (plaintiff could not show defendant had knowledge horse would throw rider); Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, Inc. (1983), 91 A.D.2d 1029, 458 N.Y.S.2d 619, aff'd., 59 N.Y.2d 741, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441, 450 N.E.2d 247 (plaintiff could not show defendant had knowledge hor......
-
Ansick v. Hillenbrand Industries, Inc.
...for injury caused by such an animal unless he knows or should have known of its vicious propensities."); Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, Inc., 91 A.D.2d 1029, 1030, 458 N.Y.S.2d 619 (1983) (plaintiff failed to come forward with any evidentiary proof that the horse that she was riding had ever ma......
-
Carter v. Metro North Associates
...might endanger the person or property of others" (1A PJI 2:220 at 876; see also, Dickson v. McCoy, 39 N.Y. 400; Appel v. Charles Heinsohn, 91 A.D.2d 1029, 1030, 458 N.Y.S.2d 619, affd. 59 N.Y.2d 741, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441, 450 N.E.2d 247; Shuffian v. Garfola, 9 A.D.2d 910, 195 N.Y.S.2d 45). Whet......
-
Macho v. Mahowald
...experienced rider, fell. There was no claim of viciousness. Hojem v. Kelly, 21 Wash.App. 200, 584 P.2d 451 (1978). In Appel v. Heinsohn, 91 A.D.2d 1029, 458 N.Y.S.2d 619, aff'd, 59 N.Y.2d 741, 450 N.E.2d 247, 463 N.Y.S.2d 441 (1983), no negligence was found when plaintiff fell off a horse, ......