APX Operating Co. v. HDI Glob. Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 18 November 2021 |
Docket Number | C. A. N21C-03-058 AML CCLD |
Parties | APX OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. HDI GLOBAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. |
Court | Delaware Superior Court |
Submitted: September 22, 2021
Upon Defendant's Motion to Dismiss: GRANTED
Brian M. Rostocki, Esquire, Benjamin P. Chapple, Esquire, Justin Forcier, Esquire, John Ellison, Esquire, Miranda Jannuzzi Esquire, of REED SMITH LLP, Wilmington, Delaware, Attorneys for Plaintiff APX Operating Company, LLC
John D. Balaguer, Esquire, of WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP, Wilmington Delaware, and Kristin C. Cummins, Esquire, of ZELLE LLP Dallas, Texas, and Kristin A. Heres, Equire, of ZELLE LLP, Framingham, MA, Attorneys for Defendant HDI Global Insurance Company, LLC
The plaintiff, a Delaware LLC that owns and operates eight businesses through various subsidiaries, seeks insurance coverage for economic losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated government closure mandates. The policy at issue insured the plaintiff's real property against "direct physical loss or direct physical harm," and against the losses that accrue when such loss or harm requires business operations at the property to be suspended. The insurer argues the plaintiff's coverage claim must be dismissed because the plaintiff has not identified "direct physical loss or direct physical damage" sufficient to establish coverage. Alternatively, the insurer argues several policy exclusions preclude coverage.
The pending motion raises two questions. First, has the plaintiff established that its claim falls within the coverage granted by the policy? Second, has the insurer established that the policy specifically excludes the plaintiff's claim? The first question need not be answered because the claim would be excluded even if the plaintiff could establish coverage in the first instance. Accordingly, the insurer's motion to dismiss is granted. Although the Court recognizes and sympathizes with the significant toll COVID-19 wrought on businesses and their employees through the country, the Court is bound to give effect to the clear and unambiguous terms of the plaintiff's insurance policy.
Unless otherwise noted, the following facts are drawn from the Complaint and the documents it incorporates by reference drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.
Plaintiff APX Operating Co., LLC ("APX") is a Delaware limited liability company.[1] It is the sole owner of eight subsidiaries, all of which are Delaware limited liability companies.[2] Through its subsidiaries, APX operates six family entertainment centers and two water parks in California, Florida, and New Jersey.[3]These eight properties constitute the "Insured Properties" at issue in this case.[4]
Defendant HDI Global Insurance Co. ("HDI") is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois.[5] It is licensed to do business in Delaware, where it sells property insurance covering companies' commercial risks.[6]
HDI sold Commercial Lines Policy number CPD5484800[7] to Apex Parks Group, LLC, which was extended by endorsement to include the period from May 8, 2019 to May 8, 2020 (the "Policy").[8] Apex Parks is the Named Insured under the Policy.[9] APX acquired Apex Parks' rights to payment under the Policy for the claim at issue in this case.[10]
The Policy's Insuring Clause states it "insures against risks of direct physical loss or direct physical damage, except as excluded, to Insured covered property while on described premises."[11] The Policy also insures "TIME ELEMENT LOSS" as follows:
The Policy's "TIME ELEMENT" coverage includes "GROSS EARNINGS" and "EXTRA EXPENSE."[13] These coverages apply to lost earnings and extra costs incurred to "temporarily continue as nearly normal as practicable" the business.[14] Under both sections, the recoverable loss is measured during the "PERIOD OF LIABILITY," which the Policy defines as follows:
The Policy contains several exclusions, two of which are relevant here. First, the Policy excludes "contamination including but not limited to the presence of pollution or hazardous material" (the "Pollution and Contamination Exclusion").[15]The Policy defines these terms in a separate section as follows:
Second, the Policy excludes coverage for "loss of market or loss of use" (the "Loss of Use Exclusion") as follows:
In December 2019, an outbreak of the illness known as COVID-19 caused by a novel coronavirus formally known as SARS-CoV-2 first was identified.[18] A pandemic arose in the following months.[19] SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible, even by asymptomatic individuals.[20] An individual can become infected through exposure to respiratory droplets of an infected person, as well as by touching surfaces or objects that have SARS-CoV-2 on them and then touching his or her mouth, eyes, or nose.[21] Infected persons shed infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions in high quantities.[22] Although these virions are microscopic, they physically exist in the air and attach to surfaces.[23] SARS-CoV-2 virions may remain viable on surfaces for hours or days, depending on the material.[24]
Beginning in March 2020, state and local governments in the United States issued orders suspending or severely curtailing the operations of non-essential businesses.[25] These orders "resulted from the need to address the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and the transmission of COVID-19" in the areas affected by the orders.[26] Such orders required operations to be suspended at APX's subsidiaries in California, Florida, and New Jersey.[27] Most of the businesses were allowed to reopen starting in late June and early July after the closure mandates began to lift.[28]Social distancing procedures and other limitations on operations have continued to affect APX's businesses, however, and none have returned to pre-interruption earning levels.[29]
Because of the infectious nature of SARS-CoV-2, APX alleges:
it is a statistical certainty that SARS-CoV-2 virions were physically present in the air, within infected persons, and on surfaces located at most, if not all, of the Insured Properties prior to the issuance of the aforementioned civil authority orders, and that infected individuals would have been present at all of the Insured Properties and surrounding properties on an ever-increasing number in the absence of the issuance of those orders.[30]
The alleged release of COVID-19 virions into the air and onto the surfaces within the Insured Properties made the properties "dangerous" and the air "potentially lethal to breathe."[31]
In its Complaint, APX identifies several losses it contends fall within the Policy's coverage. First, APX identifies "[t]he...
To continue reading
Request your trial