Aquaco, Inc. v. Hopkin, 75--987

Decision Date09 December 1975
Docket NumberNo. 75--987,75--987
PartiesAQUACO, INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Norma HOPKIN d/b/a Tropical Fish Warehouse and Northwest Miami Tropical Wholesalers, Inc., Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Krongold & Bass and Theodore Bayer, Miami, for appellant.

Emanuel Sponder, Miramar, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Aquaco, Inc., plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from an order granting defendants' motion to transfer, which motion asserted the defense of improper venue.

The sole question presented on this interlocutory appeal is whether the defendants waived their privilege of venue when they did not file a timely motion therefor or claim the privilege in their answer but asserted the venue privilege, apparently under § 47.011, Fla.Stat., by motion filed subsequent to the answer. We hold that defendants' privilege of venue is deemed waived. Brennan v. Brennan, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 782; Singer v. Tobin, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 799; Fixel v. Clevenger, Fla.App.1973, 285 So.2d 687.

The trial court's order of transfer is reversed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Valle v. Mador, 85-1075
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 5 Noviembre 1985
    ...privilege in a responsive pleading or in a timely motion, Finkelstein v. Godard, 404 So.2d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Aquaco, Inc. v. Hopkin, 323 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140(h), or by stipulation, agreement, or consent. Ringling Bros. Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc. v......
  • Sanders v. Inversiones Varias, S.A. (Invasa), 84-89
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 4 Mayo 1984
    ...Bottling Company v. McDaniel, 78 So.2d 100 (Fla.1955); Straske v. McGillicuddy, 388 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Aquaco, Inc. v. Hopkin, 323 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Fla.R.Civ.P. Therefore for the reasons above stated, the order under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. Affirm......
  • TIP TOP ENTERPRISES v. SUMMIT CONSULTING, 3D04-1576.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 6 Abril 2005
    ...instead for a subsequently filed motion for change of venue. As the rule makes clear, the defense was waived. See Aquaco, Inc. v. Hopkin, 323 So.2d 678, 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)(finding that the defendants waived their venue privilege when "they did not file a timely motion therefor or claim ......
  • MacDonald v. MacDonald, AV-6
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 24 Enero 1984
    ...venue prior to or contemporaneously with the answer results in a waiver of that privilege. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140(h); Aquaco, Inc. v. Hopkin, 323 So.2d 678 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Here, however, the husband contends that the wife's amended petition, in particular her request for an award of the mar......
1 books & journal articles
  • Litigating at light speed.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 83 No. 1, January 2009
    • 1 Enero 2009
    ...issue in litigation follow many of the procedures that govern injunction. FLA. R. CIV. P. 1.620(b); Overseas Development, Inc. v. Krause, 323 So. 2d 678, 680 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1975). See also Lakeview Townhomes of California Club, Inc. v. Coral Gables Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n, 656 So. 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT