Aragon v. 233 West 21st Street, Inc.

Decision Date15 February 1994
Citation607 N.Y.S.2d 642,201 A.D.2d 353
PartiesJuana Luisa ARAGON, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. 233 WEST 21ST STREET, INC., Defendant-Appellant-Respondent, Cole Restoration Corp., Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, York Scaffold Equipment Corp., et al., Defendants-Respondents. 233 WEST 21ST STREET, INC., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. D.N.A. CONSTRUCTION CORP., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. COLE RESTORATION CORP., Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant, v. D.N.A. CONSTRUCTION CORP., Second Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. D.N.A. CONSTRUCTION CORP., Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW YORK, et al., Fourth-Party Defendants-Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Before ELLERIN, J.P., and WALLACH, KUPFERMAN and RUBIN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM DECISION.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.), entered October 28, 1992, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability against defendant owner, 233 West 21st Street, Inc., and defendant general contractor, Cole Restoration Corporation, but denied 233 West 21st Street's cross-motion for summary judgment against Cole on the basis of common law and contractual indemnification, against third party defendant D.N.A. Construction Corp. on the basis of common law indemnity and against its co-defendants York Scaffold Equipment Corp., York Ladder, Inc. and York Scaffold & Ladder on the basis of common law negligence and strict liability, unanimously modified, on the law, only to the extent of granting 233 West 21st Street, Inc.'s cross-motion for summary judgment against Cole on the basis of both common law and contractual indemnity and, as so modified, the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this personal injury and wrongful death action arising from the collapse of a scaffold on which plaintiff's decedent was performing brick restoration work on a residential apartment building, plaintiff was properly granted summary judgment on the issue of liability inasmuch as the collapse of a scaffold is prima facie evidence of a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) which shifts the burden to defendants to raise a factual issue on liability (see, Bras v. Atlas Const. Corp., 166 A.D.2d 401, 560 N.Y.S.2d 467). Despite defendants' arguments, there is simply no evidence from which an inference could be made that the decedent had "refused" to avail...

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Tambasco v. Norton Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 August 1994
    ...183 A.D.2d at 993, 583 N.Y.S.2d 596; see also, Lawyer v. Rotterdam Ventures, 204 A.D.2d 878, 612 N.Y.S.2d 682; Aragon v. 233 W. 21st St., 201 A.D.2d 353, 607 N.Y.S.2d 642; Curtis v. 37th St. Assocs., 198 A.D.2d 62, 603 N.Y.S.2d 438; Comes v. New York State Elec. & Gas Corp., 189 A.D.2d 945,......
  • Buccini v. 1568 Broadway Associates
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 May 1998
    ...have dispatched persons to observe the progress and method of the work does not render it actively negligent" (Aragon v. 233 W. 21st Street, 201 A.D.2d 353, 354, 607 N.Y.S.2d 642). Not only is the common-law clear that HRH had no obligation to prevent the accident simply by virtue of its su......
  • Delaney v. Spiegel Associates
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 8 March 1996
    ...and Rise for common-law indemnification (see, Gillmore v. Duke/Fluor Daniel, 221 A.D.2d 938, 634 N.Y.S.2d 588; Aragon v. 233 W. 21st St., 201 A.D.2d 353, 354, 607 N.Y.S.2d 642; see generally, Newin Corp. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 62 N.Y.2d 916, 479 N.Y.S.2d 3, 467 N.E.2d 887; Matter of......
  • Allen v. Village of Farmingdale
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 9 April 2001
    ...otherwise actively negligent (see, Dawson v Pavarini Constr. Co., 228 A.D.2d 466; Richardson v Matarese, 206 A.D.2d 354; Aragon v 233 West 21st St., 201 A.D.2d 353). The mere fact that the Village's consulting engineers would occasionally visit the job site to check on the work does not req......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT