Arch Ins. Co. v. U.S. Youth Soccer Ass'n, Inc.
Decision Date | 12 May 2014 |
Docket Number | No. 05-12-00596-CV,05-12-00596-CV |
Parties | ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant v. UNITED STATES YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Reversed and Remanded; Opinion Filed May 12, 2014
On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Lewis
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Appellant Arch Insurance Company ("Arch") appeals from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee United States Youth Soccer Association, Inc. ("USYSA"). In two issues, Arch alleges: (1) the summary judgment evidence proves that an exclusion within its liability insurance contract excludes coverage and a duty to defend USYSA in a grievance filed with the United States Soccer Federation (USSF) and (2) the summary judgment evidence fails to establish as a matter of law that all of the attorneys' fees awarded by the trial court were reasonable and necessary and incurred in the defense of USYSA in the USSF grievance. For the reasons expressed in this opinion, we reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
Background
USYSA is a nonprofit corporation that organizes and hosts a variety of youth soccer events for its organization members and its player members. USYSA is a member of the USSF, which is recognized by the United States Olympic Committee ("USOC") as the national governing board for soccer in the United States. The Amateur Sports Act, 36 U.S.C. §§220501-220529, governs the USOC and its recognition of national governing bodies. An affidavit from the Executive Director of the USYSA states the USYSA is a member of the USSF pursuant to provisions implemented by the USSF as required by the Amateur Sports Act.
Underlying Arbitration
On August 17, 2009, the National Association of Competitive Soccer Clubs d/b/a US Club Soccer ("US Club Soccer") and three members of US Club Soccer—Minnesota Thunder Academy, Coast Futbol Alliance, Inc., and Vitesse Soccer, Inc. (collectively the "grievance complainants")—filed a Grievance Complaint with the USSF against USYSA and five other USSF Organization Members—the Minnesota Youth Soccer Association, the North Dakota Youth Soccer Association, the South Carolina Youth Soccer Association, the Tennessee State Soccer Association, and the Wisconsin Youth Soccer Association (the "grievance respondents").
In the Grievance Complaint, the grievance complainants alleged that the grievance respondents, including the USYSA, failed to comply with their respective membership requirements as provided in the USSF bylaws. The grievance complainants alleged that USYSA breached these bylaws by instituting a number of policies, rules, procedures and practices that were designed to make it more difficult for children, coaches, teams and clubs to participate in the grievance respondents' events, and to restrict the grievance complainants' members from participating in USYSA soccer programs or USYSA member programs.
In their brief before us, the grievance complainants point out that the Grievance Complaint also contained allegations of discrimination in violation of the Amateur Sports Act. Specifically, the grievance complainants alleged "USYSA and some of its state association members have repeatedly discriminated against [the American Youth Soccer Organization] and its players and teams in violation of the [Amateur] Sports Act and the USSF Bylaws, Policies, rules and requirements." In particular, the grievance complainants stated the AYSO had to file several grievances to procure and maintain interplay rights in the USSF's bylaws.
In the Grievance Complaint, the grievance complainants asserted the grievance respondents failed to comply with the following USSF membership requirements as follows:
The grievance complainants requested that, "as a result of the [grievance] respondents' failure to comply with their respective membership requirements," that grievance respondents "immediately come into compliance with their membership obligations in the USSF and to cease and desist from any further discrimination against the [grievance] complainants" as follows:
Arch Policy
Arch issued a claims made policy to USYSA for claims first made and reported during the September 1, 2008 to September 1, 2009 policy period (the "Policy"). Section IV.2(a) of the Policy contains the following exclusion with regard to Insuring Agreement C (the "Exclusion"):
The Insurer shall not be liable under COVERAGE C to make any payment for Loss as a result of a Claim made against an Organization for any actual or alleged obligation under or breach of any oral or written contract or agreement, including any liability of others assumed by the Organization under any such contract or agreement; provided, however, this exclusion shall not apply (i) to an actual or alleged breach of an implied contract in an Employment Claim, or (ii) to the extent the Organization would have been liable for such Loss in the absence of such contract or agreement.
Coverage Lawsuit
USYSA filed suit against Arch on...
To continue reading
Request your trial