Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co.

Document Cited authorities 16 Cited in 61 Precedent Map Related
Decision Date09 May 2002
Citation70 P.3d 495
Docket Number00CA1856
PartiesRichard ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. FARMER BROS. CO., a California corporation; Al Henshaw, individually and as an employee of Farmer Bros. Co.; and Dennie Rawson, individually and as an employee of Farmer Bros. Co., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 cases
  • Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. Agents at Arapahoe
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 5 Agosto 2009
    ...of causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress, and (3) causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress." Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 70 P.3d 495, 499 (Colo.App.2002). The first element, extreme and outrageous conduct, is satisfied if the conduct goes "beyond all possible bounds of dece......
  • Silver v. Primero Reorganized School Dist. No. 2
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 22 Agosto 2007
    ...caused the plaintiff to suffer such distress. Riske v. King Soopers, 366 F.3d 1085, 1089 (10th Cir.2004), citing Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 70 P.3d 495, 499 (Colo.App.2002). To satisfy the first element, the plaintiff must allege conduct that "goes beyond all possible bounds of decency and......
  • Hall v. Frankel
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 26 Junio 2008
    ...779 (Colo.App.1999). The same standard governs a trial court's ruling on motions for directed verdict and JNOV. Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 70 P.3d 495, 499 (Colo.App.2002), aff'd, 90 P.3d 228 (Colo.2004). Directed verdicts require the conclusion that no reasonable person would conclude tha......
  • Mackall v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 11 Septiembre 2014
    ...of causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress, and (3) causing the plaintiff severe emotional distress.” Archer v. Farmer Bros. Co., 70 P.3d 495, 499 (Colo.App.2002), aff'd, 90 P.3d 228 (Colo.2004).¶ 50 Concerning Chase's conduct, the complaint alleges only that Chase sought to enforce......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT