Archibald Gracie v. John Palmer

Decision Date13 March 1823
Citation5 L.Ed. 696,8 Wheat. 605,21 U.S. 605
PartiesARCHIBALD GRACIE and others, Plaintiffs in Error , v. JOHN PALMER and others, Defendants in Error
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

as the residue of the cargo in general, and that they shall be chargeable with freight on the returns thereof, at the rate of 50 dollars per ton; or, if the said returns shall be in goods and merchandise, usually chargeable with, or taken on, freight, by weight, that the same shall be estimated at such rate as shall be equivalent to that sum by the ton; and also, that the commission to be allowed the supercargo of the said ship, shall be a clear commission of five per centum on the amount of the investment in India. And it is further agreed, that the said charterer shall furnish and supply the needful and sufficient cabin stores to and for the supercargo, master, and officers, of the said ship, for the said voyage, and that the owners shall and will allow, and pay to him therefor, the sum of 1500 dollars; and, also, that the cabin shall belong to the said charterer, (excepting the respective state rooms in which the master and officers shall sleep.) And it is hereby further agreed, and granted and reserved, that the master shall have a privilege of six cubic tons, freight free; the first officer a like free privilege of three cubic tons, and the second officer a like free privilege of two cubic tons, provided, that neither of the said privileges shall be used for the purpose of shipping flour out in the said ship. And the said charterer, for himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, doth hereby covenant and agree with the said owners, that the said charterer will well and truly pay and satisfy all the port charges and expenses of the said ship, as well abroad as at Philadelphia aforesaid, until she shall have discharged her return cargo, excepting always the sea-stores, the wages of the master, officers, and crew, and the repairs and outfits of the said ship, with all which she is to be chargeable. And it is hereby further agreed, that there be allowed, and are granted, one hundred and twenty working days in all, for the loading and unloading of the said ship at the ports and places of loading and delivery, and that the time not used and occupied at one port or place, may be taken or made up at the others, so that the whole do not exceed the number allowed as above mentioned; and that for every detention, over and above the said one hundred and twenty days, the said charterers shall pay to the said owners the sum of 75 dollars per day, to be paid in like manner as the freight. And the said charterer, for himself, his heirs, executors, and administrators, doth hereby promise and agree, with the said owners, their executors, administrators, and assigns, that he will cause the said ship or vessel to be loaded at the said port of Philadelphia, on her being in readiness to receive her funds and cargo there, and reloaded at the island of Madeira, and at Bombay and Calcutta, in the manner above expressed; and that he will pay to them, on the return of the said ship to Philadelphia, and before the discharge of her cargo there, in approved notes, not exceeding an average time of ninety days from the time at which she shall be ready to discharge her cargo, the clear sum of 30,000 dollars; and if she shall have proceeded to Calcutta, the further sum of 2000 dollars, for the hire and freight of the said ship, for the said voyage. In witness whereof, the said owners and charterer have to these presents, in duplicate, set their hands and seals, the day and year first above written.

'ARCH. GRACIE & SONS. [L. S.]

'HUGH CHAMBERS.' [L. S.]

On the 28th of November, 1818, the America sailed from Philadelphia, upon the voyage in the charter-party mentioned, laden with sundry goods, and also 15,000 dollars in specie, the property of the defendants. The flour and other merchandise were delivered at Madeira, and the quantity of 207 pipes of wine, purchased with the proceeds, or part thereof, was there laden on board the America, and made deliverable in India. The America proceeded from Madeira to Calcutta, where the quantity of about 324 tons of her burthen was filled up from the proceeds of the outward cargo, and with such parts of the wine, taken in at Madeira, as was not disposed of at Calcutta; and the merchandise so taken in was made deliverable to sundry consignees, in the port of Philadelphia. Hugh Chambers, the charterer, was on board the said ship at Calcutta, and it was impracticable to obtain any freight for the said ship at the said port, beyond the amount so laden as aforesaid; nor could any person be induced there to ship on board of her any other goods, deliverable in the United States, upon the condition of paying, or being liable, for any freight whatever. Whereupon, the said Chambers applied to the plaintiffs to make him an advance, for the purpose of purchasing merchandise to ship on board the ship America, and did then and there, with the knowledge and consent of Edward Rosseter, the captain or master of the said ship America, enter into an agreement with the plaintiffs, that if they would make such an advance, he would leave the merchandise purchased therewith in their hands, as a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
38 cases
  • Hertz Drivurself Stations Inc. v. Siggins
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Supreme Court
    • 26 March 1948
    ...of others for hire on the other was long ago noted by the Supreme Court of the United States in Gracie v. Palmer, 1823, 8 Wheat. 604, 632, 5 L.Ed. 696, upon a question as to whether the owner of a vessel under charter to another had a carrier's lien for freight. And, the distinction has bee......
  • Gronvold v. Suryan
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Washington
    • 9 October 1935
    ...in question, and therefore that the owner cannot be held liable for the alleged wrongful acts of its officers." See, also, Gracie v. Palmer, 8 Wheat. 605, 5 L. Ed. 696; United States v. Shea, 152 U. S. 178, 14 S. Ct. 519, 38 L. Ed. 403; The Bombay (D. C.) 38 F. 512; American Steel-Barge Co.......
  • Rogers Bros. Coal Co. v. Hines
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 21 February 1922
    ... ... its acts. See Gracie v. Palmer, 8 Wheat, 605, 632, ... 633, 5 L.Ed. 696. The title by which ... ...
  • Armour Co v. Ft Morgan Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 1 March 1926
    ...ship; that this conversion involved a change in the charter party, which the master was without authority to make (Gracie v. Palmer, 8 Wheat. 605, 639, 5 L. Ed. 696); that the owner could not be subjected thereby to liability; that, moreover, under the terms of the charter party, the owner ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Protecting ecological integrity within the balancing function of property law.
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Vol. 28 No. 1, March 1998
    • 22 March 1998
    ...the Court could not simply use the exclusive treaty power of the Federal government to invalidate Johnson's claims. (94) Johnson, 21 U.S. at 605. Of course, the Court had to explain the outcome in different terms. Chief Justice John Marshall provided a tortured rationale based upon the doct......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT