Arison Shipping Co. v. Hatfield
| Decision Date | 22 November 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-1632,76-1632 |
| Citation | 352 So.2d 539 |
| Parties | ARISON SHIPPING COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, Ted Arison, Harvey Levinson, Mr. Brain, Inc., a Florida Corporation and Georgian Bay Lines, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, Appellants, v. Milton H. HATFIELD, Individually and Milton H. Hatfield, and James W. Kindelan and Others d/b/a Coopers and Lybrand, a Partnership f/k/a Lybrand, Ross Brothers & Company, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Law Offices of Howard W. Mazloff, Coral Gables, for appellants.
Paul & Thomson and Sanford L. Bohrer, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.
Appellants/plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their amended complaint for malicious prosecution.
The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether a dismissal "for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter" in a prior civil lawsuit filed against the present plaintiffs is a bona fide termination of the lawsuit sufficient to state a cause of action for malicious prosecution. We hold that it is not.
There are six elements needed to be established by a plaintiff to sustain a cause of action based upon malicious prosecution: first, the commencement or continuance of an original criminal or civil judicial proceeding; second, its legal causation by the present defendant against the present plaintiff; third, its bona fide termination in favor of the present plaintiff; fourth, absence of probable cause; fifth, presence of malice; and sixth, damage conforming to the legal standards resulting to the plaintiff. Applestein v. Preston, 335 So.2d 604 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). Such a "bona fide termination" of the prior civil suit must be an adjudication on the merits in a judicial proceeding. Jackson v. Biscayne Medical Center, Inc., 347 So.2d 721 (Fla.3d DCA 1977).
It is our opinion that a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication on the merits and thus, not a bona fide termination of the prior civil suit. See Weber v. Johnston Fuel Liners, Inc., 540 P.2d 535 (Wyo.1975); Heaney v. Purdy, 29 N.Y.2d 157, 324 N.Y.S.2d 47, 272 N.E.2d 550 (1971); Roy v. Landers, 467 S.W.2d 924 (Mo.1971); Siegel v. City of Chicago, 127 Ill.App.2d 84, 261 N.E.2d 802 (1970).
Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGugin
...760, 31 Ill.Dec. 58, 393 N.E.2d 1365 (1979); Pronger v. O'Dell, 127 Wis.2d 292, 379 N.W.2d 330 (Ct.App.1985); Arison Shipping Co. v. Hatfield, 352 So.2d 539 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1977); Berman v. RCA Auto. Corp., 177 Cal.App.3d 321, 222 Cal.Rptr. 877 Nevertheless, we follow the better reasoned a......
-
Union Oil of California Amsco Div. v. Watson
...deemed a favorable termination of the proceedings because it reflects ambiguously on the merits of the action); Arison Shipping Co. v. Hatfield, 352 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (dismissal of a civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not considered an adjudication on the mer......
-
Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc.
...v. Butler, 246 N.Y. 249, 158 N.E. 510 (1927). Lastly, the defendants call our attention to the statement in Arison Shipping Co. v. Hatfield, 352 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), that a bona fide termination of a prior civil suit "must be an adjudication on the merits." In Arison, the terminati......
-
Schoenbrod v. O'Neill
...K. Rhoads, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees. Before BARKDULL, KEHOE and SCHWARTZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Arison Shipping Co. v. Hatfield, 352 So.2d 539 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). SCHWARTZ, Judge (specially concurring). In O'Neill v. Schoenbrod, 355 So.2d 440 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied, ......