Arizona State Real Estate Dept. v. American Standard Gas & Oil Leasing Service, Inc.

Decision Date25 April 1978
Docket NumberCA-CIV,No. 1,1
Citation580 P.2d 15,119 Ariz. 183
PartiesThe ARIZONA STATE REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT and the People of the State of Arizona ex rel. Bruce E. Babbitt, the Attorney General, Appellants, v. AMERICAN STANDARD GAS & OIL LEASING SERVICE, INC., an Arizona Corporation, Appellee. 3659.
CourtArizona Court of Appeals
Bruce E. Babbitt, Former Atty. Gen. by Thomas I. McClory, Andrew W. Bettwy, Asst. Attys. Gen., Phoenix, for appellants
OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

The question in this case is whether a course of business dealing with oil and gas "leases" requires a real estate broker's license in Arizona.

The Arizona State Real Estate Department and the Arizona Attorney General brought suit against American Standard Gas & Oil Leasing Service, Inc. to enjoin it from engaging in the business of a real estate broker" without a license in violation of A.R.S. § 32-2122(A) and to assess civil penalties. The trial court denied relief after an evidentiary hearing. This appeal from the denial of the preliminary injunction followed, as prescribed by A.R.S. § 12-2101(F)(2).

American Standard is an Arizona corporation engaged in the business of assisting customers in filing for oil and gas leases issued under the Mineral Lands Leasing Act (30 U.S.C.A. § 226). The drawings for these leases are conducted under the authority of the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management in the state where the land parcels are located. The land parcels are not within any known geological structure of a producing oil and gas field, and the leases are awarded in a lottery-type process involving simultaneous filings by bidders using the Bureau of Land Management form of Simultaneous Oil and Gas Drawing Entry Card. American Standard assists the customer by selecting the parcel and by forwarding the entry card, together with the required fee, to the proper Bureau of Land Management office. The winner of the drawing obtains the right to an oil and gas lease on the parcel. Issuance of the lease requires an advance yearly rental payment of fifty cents per acre. As part of its service, American Standard advances the first year's rental on behalf of the customer to obtain the lease. The lease involved is printed on a Bureau of Land Management form and is called Lease for Oil and Gas. It is issued for a period of ten years and, thereafter, so long as oil and gas is produced in paying quantities. The parties are referred to in the lease as lessor and lessee. Rental is computed on a per-acre basis. The lessee may enter upon the land and drill wells and do a variety of things related to drilling. The lessor reserves various rights in the land and may sell, lease or otherwise dispose of the land to the extent the surface is not necessary for the use of the lessee. The lease rights may be assigned.

The facts further indicate that no land in Arizona is involved and no customers of American Standard are residents of the State of Arizona.

A.R.S. § 32-2122(A) states:

It shall be unlawful for any person to engage in the business of a real estate broker or real estate salesman or the business of a cemetery broker or cemetery salesman without first obtaining a license as prescribed in this chapter and otherwise complying with the provisions of this chapter.

A.R.S. § 32-2101(25) states, in part, as follows:

"Real estate broker" means a person, other than a salesman, who, for another and for compensation:

(c) Negotiates, offers, attempts or agrees to negotiate the sale, exchange, purchase, rental or leasing of real estate.

(d) Lists, offers, attempts or agrees to list real estate for sale, lease or exchange.

(h) Advertises or holds himself out as being engaged in the business of buying, selling, exchanging, rental or leasing real estate or counseling or advising thereon.

(i) Assists or directs in the procuring of prospects, calculated to result in the sale, exchange, leasing or rental of real estate.

(j) Assists or directs in the negotiation of any transaction calculated or intended to result in the sale, exchange, leasing or rental of real estate.

(1) Engages in the business of assisting or offering to assist another in filing an application for the purchase or lease of, or in locating or entering upon lands owned by the state or federal government.

It is clear that if the oil and gas lease at issue here represents a lease of an interest in real estate, it comes within the provisions of A.R.S. § 32-2101(25). Real estate is defined in A.R.S. § 32-2101(24) as including "leasehold-interests and any estates in land as defined in title 33, chapter 2, articles 1 and 2, regardless of whether located in this state."

Is the oil and gas lease an interest in real estate? American Standard refers us to numerous cases from other state and federal courts in support of the proposition that an oil and gas lease is not an interest in real estate. The cases refer variously to the lease as personal property, or a license to explore, or an incorporeal hereditament, or a profit a'prendre, or a chattel real. For a discussion of the problem see 1A W. Summers, Oil and Gas § 152 (1954).

We need not, however, look beyond the Arizona Supreme Court decision in State v. Superior Court, 113 Ariz. 248, 550 P.2d 626 (1976) for guidance as to whether the interest involved here is an interest in real estate. Dealing with an issue of taxation, the Supreme Court there held that an oil and gas lease, with terms similar to those here, created in the lessee an interest in land known as a qualified or determinable fee. The court pointed out that "a qualified or determinable fee is a freehold estate and, as such, is a taxable interest in land." Id. at 250, 550 P.2d at 628. While taxation was the issue in that case, we are referred to no authority which convinces us that a different analysis ought to apply in construing the Arizona real estate licensing statute. If anything, where the same would not be true of a tax statute, the policy of the law would extend the reach of a real estate licensing statute, since its purpose is to regulate real estate activities so as to protect the public. Realty Executives, Inc. v. Northrup, King & Co., 24 Ariz.App. 400, 539 P.2d 514 (1975); Bonasera v. Roffe, 8 Ariz.App. 1, 442 P.2d 165 (1968).

It is clear, then, that American Standard acts as a real estate broker within the meaning of A.R.S....

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Shorey v. Ariz. Corp. Comm'n
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • September 17, 2015
    ...State ex rel. Corbin v. Pickrell, 136 Ariz. 589, 597, 667 P.2d 1304 (1983), and Ariz. State Real Estate Dep't v. Am. Standard Gas & Oil Leasing Serv., Inc., 119 Ariz. 183, 186–87, 580 P.2d 15 (App.1978) ). Unlike in Media Products, Arizona's interest in its business reputation is at stake h......
  • Johnson v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • June 17, 1985
    ... ... He was able to complete the standard Bruce Protocol in eight minutes, and during this ... Lampe v. Zamzow's, Inc., 102 Idaho 126, 626 P.2d 782, 783 (1981); ... Graves v. American Smelting & Refining Co., 87 Idaho 451, 455, 394 ... are so injured that they can perform no service other than those which are so limited in quality, ... State, 104 Idaho 337, 659 P.2d 91 (1983), latent and ... Dept. of Law Enforcement, 79 Idaho 40, 311 P.2d 976 ... ...
  • State ex rel. Corbin v. Goodrich, 2
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • May 2, 1986
    ...residents. See State, ex rel. Corbin v. Pickrell, 136 Ariz. 589, 667 P.2d 1304 (1983); Arizona State Real Estate Department v. American Standard Gas, 119 Ariz. 183, 186-187, 580 P.2d 15, 18-19 (1978). The Arizona Securities Act does not impose an excessive Nor does Polaris Interm. Metals v.......
  • Grynberg v. Commissioner
    • United States
    • U.S. Tax Court
    • January 13, 2000
    ...fully deductible, effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 1981. 5. See Arizona State Real Estate Dept. v. American Standard Gas & Oil Leasing Serv. Inc., 580 P.2d 15 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1978); Hagood v. Heckers, 513 P.2d 208 (Colo. 1973); Jaenicke v. Davidson, 287 N.W. 472 (Mich. 1939)......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT