Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transport Company
Citation | 205 S.W.2d 716,212 Ark. 1 |
Decision Date | 06 October 1947 |
Docket Number | 4-8231 |
Parties | Arkansas Express, Inc., v. Columbia Motor Transport Company |
Court | Supreme Court of Arkansas |
Rehearing Denied December 1, 1947.
Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Second Division; Lawrence C Auten, Judge.
Modified and Affirmed.
Louis Tarlowski, for appellant.
Henry Donham, for appellee.
Appellee, Columbia Motor Transport Company, a Delaware Corporation, made application to Arkansas Public Service Commission for certificate authorizing appellee to operate as a motor carrier of freight within this state. Appellants, thirty-three duly licensed motor freight carriers, filed protest and resisted the application. After an extended hearing the Commission granted the application and ordered the issuance of the certificate of convenience and authority as prayed for by appellee. The protesting carriers appealed to the Pulaski Circuit Court, where judgment affirming the Commission's order was rendered. This appeal is prosecuted from that judgment.
The service proposed by appellee and authorized by the Commission was to be rendered in accordance with a contract entered into between appellee and Guy A. Thompson, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, on March 19, 1946. This contract contemplated "a system of coordinated rail-motor-truck service, auxiliary to or supplemental of the Trustee's service by rail, for the handling of less-than-carload freight . . . over certain highway routes and between stations on certain lines of railroad of Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor, located within the state of Arkansas. . . ." Under this contract appellee agreed to haul in motor trucks, along prescribed routes, from certain stations of the railroad company to certain other designated stations of the company, freight tendered to it by the railroad company. Appellee was to be compensated for this hauling on a mileage basis at such rates as should be thereafter agreed upon by the parties to the contract.
The trustee in bankruptcy of the railroad company was authorized to enter into this contract by order of the United States District Court, in which the bankruptcy proceeding was pending, and the trustee, supporting appellee's request, intervened in the proceeding before the Public Service Commission.
The proposed service was thus described by the Commission in its order:
. . .
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Missouri Pacific Transp. Co. v. Inter City Transit Co.
...S.W.2d 742; Southwestern Greyhound Lines v. Missouri Pac. Transp. Co., 211 Ark. 295, 200 S.W.2d 772; Arkansas Express, Inc., v. Columbia Motor Transp. Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716; Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Batesville Truck Line, 214 Ark. 448, 216 S.W.2d 857; Wisinger v. Stewart, A......
-
Fisher v. Branscum, 5--4328
...Potashnick Truck Service, Inc. v. Missouri & Arkansas Transportation Co., 203 Ark. 506, 157 S.W.2d 512; Arkansas Express, Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transport Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716; Wisinger v. Stewart, supra; Washington Transfer & Storage Co. v. Harding, 229 Ark. 546, 317 S.W.2d 3. I......
-
Arkansas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Batesville Truck Line, Inc
... ... The ... Missouri Pacific Railway Company resisted appellee's ... application before the Commission, but is not a ... Railway Company and its affiliate, Columbia Motor Transport ... Company, operate from Little Rock to Batesville, but ... 200, 199 S.W.2d 742; ... and Arkansas Express Inc. v. Columbia Motor ... ...
-
Arkansas Motor Freight Lines v. Batesville Truck Line
...v. Owen, 209 Ark. 861, 192 S.W.2d 757; Schulte v. Southern Bus Lines, 211 Ark. 200, 199 S.W.2d 742; and Arkansas Express Inc. v. Columbia Motor Transport Co., 212 Ark. 1, 205 S.W.2d 716. In Vol. 2, page 67 of the Arkansas Law Review there is a Comment entitled "Judicial Review of Findings o......